|Abstract||Even if physicians follow all of the requirements for determining patient capacity in Oregon's physician-assisted suicide act, their ultimate conclusions will be subjective and heavily influenced by their own personal values.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Michael B. Gill (2009). Is the Legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide Compatible with Good End-of-Life Care? Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):27-45.
Perry A. Pugno (2004). One Physician's Perspective: Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide. Health Care Analysis 12 (3):215-223.
Kevin WM Wildes (1993). Conscience, Referral, and Physician Assisted Suicide. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (3):323-328.
Bert Gordijn & Rien Janssens (2001). New Developments in Dutch Legislation Concerning Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):299 – 309.
F. M. Kamm (1999). Physician‐Assisted Suicide, the Doctrine of Double Effect, and the Ground of Value. Ethics 109 (3):586-605.
M. T. Harvey (2002). What Does a `Right' to Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS) Legally Entail? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5).
Richard Momeyer (1995). Does Physician Assisted Suicide Violate the Integrity of Medicine? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):13-24.
Susan R. Martyn & Henry J. Bourguignon, Physician-Assisted Suicide: The Supreme Court's Wary Rejection.
Andrew Sneddon (2006). Equality, Justice, and Paternalism: Recentreing Debate About Physician-Assisted Suicide. Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (4):387–404.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #62,387 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?