Graduate studies at Western
Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (3):405-407 (2003)
|Abstract||: Two recent articles described two ways of writing the history of philosophy, one analytic, the other historical, as if the history of philosophy cannot be both analytically sharp and contextually informed at the same time. I recommend the practice of "Philosophical History of Philosophy," which combines the advantages of the analytic and historical methods|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Darren Staloff (1995). The Search for a Meaningful Past. Teaching Co..
Hans-Johann Glock (2008). Analytic Philosophy and History: A Mismatch? Mind 117 (468):867-897.
Tom Sorell & G. A. J. Rogers (eds.) (2005). Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Tim Crane (2012). Philosophy, Logic, Science, History. Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):20-37.
Juliet Floyd (2009). Recent Themes in the History of Early Analytic Philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2):pp. 157-200.
C. Chimisso (2003). The Tribunal of Philosophy and its Norms: History and Philosophy in Georges Canguilhem's Historical Epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (2):297-327.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #53,612 of 739,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,476 of 739,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?