David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 44 (4):300 - 325 (1999)
The concept of προπάθειαι or "pre-emotions" is known not only to the Roman Stoics and Christian exegetes but also to Philo of Alexandria. Philo also supplies the term προπάθεια at "QGen" 1.79. As Philo cannot have derived what he knows from Seneca (despite his visit to Rome in 39), nor from Cicero, who also mentions the point, he must have found it in older Stoic writings. The προπάθεια concept, rich in implications for the voluntariness and phenomenology of the passions proper, is thus confirmed for the Hellenistic period. It is not to be expected that Philo's handling of this or any concept will necessarily conform to the usage of his Stoic sources. His evidence is nonetheless of great value where it coincides with that of other witnesses. In "QGen" 4.73 the emphasis falls upon involuntariness and the mechanisms of impression and assent as in Epictetus fr. 9. The προπάθεια saves the virtuous person's insusceptibility to emotion exactly as it does for the Stoic spokesman in Gellius NA 19.1; this point is of some interest in view of the Christological use of this concept in Origen and Didymus. "QGen" 1.55 and 3.56 indicate that the occurrence of the προπάθειαι is dependent upon uncertainty, and further, that for Philo, as for Seneca in "Ira" 2.3.4, a thought not acted upon can count as a προπάθεια. In "QGen" 4.15-17 and 1.79, Philo indicates that hope and perhaps laughter may be related to joy as προπάθεια to πάθος; these assertions are not paralleled in extant Stoic texts. Further, in "QGen" 2.57, he names "biting and contraction" as the εὐπάθεια corresponding to grief, supplying a helpful parallel for "Cic. Tusc." 3.83 and Plut. "Virt. Mor." 449a. The topic may well have been discussed by Posidonius, as suggested by Cooper and others, but Posidonius' attested innovations are rather different in character from the points which have caught the attention of Philo. Taking together the indirect evidence of Philo, Seneca, and Cicero, we may reasonably infer that the προπάθεια concept belonged already to an earlier period of Stoicism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Angela Maria Mazzanti (2003). The "Mysteries" in Philo of Alexandria. In Francesca Calabi (ed.), Italian Studies on Philo of Alexandria. Brill Academic Publishers
Gretchen Reydams-Schils (2002). Philo of Alexandria on Stoic and Platonist Psycho-Physiology. Ancient Philosophy 22 (1):125-147.
Margaret Graver (1999). Philo of Alexandria and the Origins of the Stoic O. Phronesis 44 (4):300-325.
Lucio Troiani (2003). Philo of Alexandria and Christianity at its Origins. In Francesca Calabi (ed.), Italian Studies on Philo of Alexandria. Brill Academic Publishers
Francesca Calabi (ed.) (2003). Italian Studies on Philo of Alexandria. Brill Academic Publishers.
Liliana Rosso Ubigli (2003). The Image of Israel in the Writings of Philo of Alexandria. In Francesca Calabi (ed.), Italian Studies on Philo of Alexandria. Brill Academic Publishers
Naomi G. Cohen (2004). Philo on the Creation D. T. Runia: Philo of Alexandria : On the Creation of the Cosmos According to Moses. Introduction, Translation and Commentary . (Philo of Alexandria Commentary Series 1.) Pp. XVIII + 443. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne: Brill, 2001. Cased, €103/Us$120. Isbn: 90-04-12169-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 54 (1):50.
Ronald Williamson (1989). Jews in the Hellenistic World: Philo. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads2 ( #553,718 of 1,725,989 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,725,989 )
How can I increase my downloads?