Proclus on Nature: Philosophy of Nature and its Methods in Proclus' Commentary on Plato's Timaeus

Brill (2010)
Abstract
One of the hardest questions to answer for a (Neo)platonist is to what extent and how the changing and unreliable world of sense perception can itself be an object of scientific knowledge. My dissertation is a study of the answer given to that question by the Neoplatonist Proclus (Athens, 411-485) in his Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. I present a new explanation of Proclus’ concept of nature and show that philosophy of nature consists of several related subdisciplines matching the ontological stratification of nature. Moreover, I demonstrate that for Proclus philosophy of nature is a science, albeit a hypothetical one, which takes geometry as its methodological paradigm. I also offer an explanation of Proclus’ view of what is later called the mathematization of physics, i.e. the role of the substance of mathematics, as opposed to its method, in explaining the natural world. Finally, I discuss Proclus’ views of the discourse of philosophy of nature and its iconic character
Keywords Philosophy of nature
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book $130.00 used (22% off)   $144.34 new (18% off)   $171.00 direct from Amazon    Amazon page
Call number B387.P763.M37 2010
ISBN(s) 9789004181915     9004181911
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,346
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Danielle A. Layne (2009). Refutation and Double Ignorance in Proclus. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):347-362.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-05-19

Total downloads

22 ( #75,143 of 1,096,680 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #271,187 of 1,096,680 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.