Restricted composition
In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Blackwell Pub. (2008)
| Abstract | Let’s begin with a simple example. Consider two quarks: one near the tip of your nose, the other near the center of Alpha Centauri. Here is a question about these two subatomic particles: Is there an object that has these two quarks as its parts and that has no other parts? According to one view of the matter (a view that is surprisingly endorsed by a great many contemporary philosophers), the answer to this question is Yes. But I think it is fair to say that according to common sense, the answer to this question is really No, there is no object that has as its only two parts a quark near the tip of your nose and another quark near the center of Alpha Centauri. | |||||||||
| Keywords | mereology universalism restricted composition material objects nihilism | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
|
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Katherine Hawley (2004). Borderline Simple or Extremely Simple. The Monist 87 (3):385-404.
Ross P. Cameron (2012). Composition as Identity Doesn't Settle the Special Composition Question1. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):531-554.
Ned Markosian (1998). Simples. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):213 – 228.
Kris McDaniel (2003). Against Maxcon Simples. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):265 – 275.
Ned Markosian (1998). Brutal Composition. Philosophical Studies 92 (3):211-249.
Ned Markosian (1998). Brutal Composition. Philosophical Studies 92 (3):211 - 249.
Ned Markosian (1998). Brutal Composition. Philosophical Studies 92 (3):211-249.
Nikk Effingham (2011). Undermining Motivations for Universalism. Noûs 45 (4):696-713.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads156 ( #2,329 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)33 ( #1,255 of 549,119 )How can I increase my downloads? |

