David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
NanoEthics 2 (1):43-60 (2008)
Risk management of nanotechnology is challenged by the enormous uncertainties about the risks, benefits, properties, and future direction of nanotechnology applications. Because of these uncertainties, traditional risk management principles such as acceptable risk, cost–benefit analysis, and feasibility are unworkable, as is the newest risk management principle, the precautionary principle. Yet, simply waiting for these uncertainties to be resolved before undertaking risk management efforts would not be prudent, in part because of the growing public concerns about nanotechnology driven by risk perception heuristics such as affect and availability. A more reflexive, incremental, and cooperative risk management approach is required, which not only will help manage emerging risks from nanotechnology applications, but will also create a new risk management model for managing future emerging technologies.
|Keywords||Nanotechnology Regulation Risk management Risk perception Heuristics Voluntary programs|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Céline Kermisch (2012). Do New Ethical Issues Arise at Each Stage of Nanotechnological Development? NanoEthics 6 (1):29-37.
Gary E. Marchant, Douglas J. Sylvester & Kenneth W. Abbott (2009). What Does the History of Technology Regulation Teach Us About Nano Oversight? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (4):724-731.
Neelke Doorn (2013). Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Model for Responsible Governance. NanoEthics 7 (1):29-43.
Shawn Harmon, Shang-Yung Yen & Shu-Mei Tang (2011). Invigorating 'Nanoethics': Recommendations for Improving Deliberations in Taiwan and Beyond. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 5 (3):309-318.
Stephen H. Cutcliffe, Christine M. Pense & Michael Zvalaren (2012). Framing the Discussion: Nanotechnology and the Social Construction of Technology--What STS Scholars Are Saying. NanoEthics 6 (2):81-99.
Similar books and articles
Joan Duckenfield (2013). Antibiotic Resistance Due to Modern Agricultural Practices: An Ethical Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2):333-350.
Judy Larkin (2003). Strategic Reputation Risk Management. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jennifer Kuzma & John C. Besley (2008). Ethics of Risk Analysis and Regulatory Review: From Bio- to Nanotechnology. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 2 (2):149-162.
Céline Kermisch (2012). Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):91-102.
Frank C. Krysiak (2009). Risk Management as a Tool for Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):483 - 492.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #141,639 of 1,413,402 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,345 of 1,413,402 )
How can I increase my downloads?