David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Research 21:391-403 (1996)
This paper examines Richard Rorty’s “ironic liberalism,” arguing that it has no rational justitication. Rorty’s neopragmatism is first taken into account, tracing its origin and development to the political education he received in his youth. As is well known, Rorty defines himself as a liberal democrat, claiming that Westem liberal thought has produced the best form of political and social life which has ever appeared on our planet. However, if one asks why he is so positive about that, no answer can be found in Rorty’s works. The paper goes on revealing Rorty’s political philosophy as a corollary of his overall meaning holism, which takes the social and political body to be a Quinean net with no center and no boundary. Resorting to a mental experiment, the paper eventually shows that Rorty’s ironic liberalism is not a position which facilitates human choice in dramatic conditions. Any totalitarian ideology rnight readily discard ironic liberalism, because it would be easy to show that its supporters cannot even argue in favor of their convictions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Frederic Volpi (2002). Pragmatism and 'Compassionate' Political Change: Some Implications of Richard Rorty's Anti-Foundationalist Liberalism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (5):537-557.
David Rondel (2009). &Quot;liberalism, Ethnocentrism, and Solidarity: Reflections on Rorty&Quot;. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:55-68.
Rudi Visker (1999). 'Hold the Being': How to Split Rorty Between Irony and Finitude. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (2):27-45.
Richard Rorty (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press.
Hartmut von Sass (2011). Religion in a Private Igloo? A Critical Dialogue with Richard Rorty. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (3):203-216.
Paul D. Forster (2000). Problems with Rorty's Pragmatist Defense of Liberalism. Journal of Philosophical Research 25:345-362.
Michael Bacon (2003). Liberal Universalism: On Brian Barry and Richard Rorty. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (2):41-62.
Dazhi Yao (2008). Postmodernist Liberalism: A Critique of Richard Rorty's Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (3):455-463.
Randall Peerenboom (2000). The Limits of Irony: Rorty and the China Challenge. Philosophy East and West 50 (1):56-89.
Ronald Beiner (1993). Richard Rorty's Liberalism. Critical Review 7 (1):15-31.
Yao Dazhi & Xiang Yunhua (2008). Postmodernist Liberalism: A Critique of Richard Rorty's Political Philosophy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (3):455 - 463.
Andrew Jason Cohen (2000). On Universalism: Communitarians, Rorty, and (“Objectivist”) “Liberal Metaphysicians”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):39-75.
Giorgio Baruchello (2004). Cesare Beccaria and the Cruelty of Liberalism: An Essay on Liberalism of Fear and its Limits. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):303-313.
Richard Rorty (2006). Take Care of Freedom and Truth Will Take Care of Itself: Interviews with Richard Rorty. Stanford University Press.
Sterling Lynch (2007). Romantic Longings, Moral Ideals, and Democratic Priorities: On Richard Rorty's Use of the Distinction Between the Private and the Public. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (1):97 – 120.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads4 ( #254,164 of 1,100,751 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #289,565 of 1,100,751 )
How can I increase my downloads?