Response to Briscoe (2010)
Cognitive Science 34 (8):1543-1547 (2010)
| Abstract | In an earlier paper my colleagues and I put forth a theory called “perceiving-the-present” that predicts a systematic pattern across a large variety of illusions, and we presented evidence that the systematic pattern exists. Briscoe puts forth arguments against the theory and the existence of the systematic pattern. Here I provide counterarguments to his criticisms of the theory, and I explain why his arguments do not bear on the existence of the systematic pattern | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen Spielman (1974). The Logic of Tests of Significance. Philosophy of Science 41 (3):211-226.
Graham Carey (1938). Pattern. Newport, R.I.,J. Stevens.
Beth J. Singer (1999). Philosophic Systems and Systematic Philosophy. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:227-235.
Axel Cleeremans (2010). Action Blindness in Response to Gradual Changes. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):152-171.
Jennifer Nagel (2011). The Psychological Basis of the Harman-Vogel Paradox. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (5):1-28.
Christopher Woodard (2008). A New Argument Against Rule Consequentialism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (3):247 - 261.
Robert Briscoe (2010). Perceiving the Present: Systematization of Illusions or Illusion of Systematization? Cognitive Science 34 (8):1530-1542.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-11Total downloads8 ( #123,036 of 549,070 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,070 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
