David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):715-736 (2012)
There is reason for genuine puzzlement about Hume's aim in ‘The Natural History of Religion’. Some commentators take the work to be merely a causal investigation into the psychological processes and environmental conditions that are likely to give rise to the first religions, an investigation that has no significant or straightforward implications for the rationality or justification of religious belief. Others take the work to constitute an attack on the rationality and justification of religious belief in general. In contrast to these views, I argue that Hume aims to establish two important claims in ‘The Natural History of Religion’. First, almost all popular religions, including popular monotheism, are deeply superstitious. Second, superstitious monotheism is incompatible with the variety of theism supported by the argument from design. This incompatibility puts significant pressure on the rational acceptability of popular religions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. C. A. Gaskin (ed.) (1998/2009/2008). David Hume: Principal Writings on Religion Including Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and, the Natural History of Religion. Oxford University Press.
Lorne Falkenstein (2003). Hume's Project in ‘the Natural History of Religion’. Religious Studies 39 (1):1-21.
P. J. E. Kail (2007). Understanding Hume's Natural History of Religion. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):190–211.
Martin Bell (2011). Design Flaws. The Philosophers' Magazine (54):80-84.
Don Garrett (2012). What's True About Hume's 'True Religion'? Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (2):199-220.
Stanley Tweyman (ed.) (1996). Hume on Natural Religion. Thoemmes Press.
Michael Alexander Stewart (1989). Scepticism and Belief in Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, And: Hume, Newton, and the Design Argument, And: Dialogues Sur la Religion Naturelle, And: Hume's Philosophy of Religion (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (3):481-485.
Timothy M. Costelloe (2004). `In Every Civilized Community': Hume on Belief and the Demise of Religion. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55 (3):171-185.
David Hume (2007). A Dissertation on the Passions: The Natural History of Religion: A Critical Edition. Oxford University Press.
Mark Collier (2013). The Natural Foundations of Religion. Philosophical Psychology (5):1-16.
Dorothy Coleman (ed.) (2007). David Hume: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Bruce Langtry (1985). Miracles and Rival Systems of Religion. Sophia 24 (1):21 - 31.
Added to index2012-06-08
Total downloads23 ( #79,829 of 1,101,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,762 of 1,101,746 )
How can I increase my downloads?