Reproduzierbarkeit Von ergebnissen vs. heuristischer gehalt wissenschaftlicher konzepte

Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17 (2):256-264 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By means of an ecological and system theoretic example it is argued, that the methodological principle of repeatable effects is only partially valid. In 1970 a conjecture of system's properties was published which was refuted later, but further research was initiated in different fields, just because it referred to a non-repeatable "false" result. The heuristic content of a concept seemed to be more important than a successful replication of an experiment. The case study exhibits the restricted validity of general methodological rules

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#618,847)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An introduction to cybernetics.W. Ross Ashby - 1956 - New York,: J. Wiley.
An introduction to cybernetics.William Ross Ashby - 1956 - London: Chapman & Hall.
Design for a Brain.W. Ross Ashby - 1953 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (14):169-173.
Logik der Forschung. [REVIEW]E. N. - 1935 - Journal of Philosophy 32 (4):107-108.

View all 7 references / Add more references