David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:193-208 (2004)
In this paper, I discuss St. Thomas’s explanation of how God knows the possibles—things He could create but never does create. Thomas’s full explanationincludes a discussion of the nature of possibility, the reality of the possibles, and whether there are divine ideas of the possibles. In this paper, I critique someof James Ross’s positions as he best represents the self-proclaimed “voluntarist” school. I believe that Ross gives Thomas’s texts an incomplete reading on this issue and I seek to provide what is missing in Ross’s reading by highlighting Thomas’s notion of virtual practical knowledge. The concept of virtual practical knowledge is overlooked even by most “traditional” Thomists, and yet I have found that virtual practical knowledge is Thomas’s richest explanation of how God knows the possibles because it incorporates the principles that Thomas introduces in his general theory of divine knowledge
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tobias Hoffmann (2009). Duns Scotus on the Origin of the Possibles in the Divine Intellect. In Stephen F. Brown, Thomas Dewender & Theo Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century. Brill
George W. Shields (2010). Eternal Objects, Middle Knowledge, and Hartshorne. Process Studies 39 (1):149-165.
Anthony Kenny (1980). Aquinas. Hill and Wang.
Anthony Kenny (1969). Aquinas. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
G. Randolph Mayes (1990). Ross and Scotus on the Existence of God: Two Proofs From Possibility. The Thomist 54 (1):97-114.
Gregory T. Doolan (2004). The Causality of the Divine Ideas in Relation to Natural Agents in Thomas Aquinas. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (3):393-409.
Ralph Gilbert Ross, Herbert Wallace Schneider & Theodore Waldman (eds.) (1974). Thomas Hobbes in His Time. University of Minnesota Press.
Mark D. Gossiaux (2003). Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Existence of God as Self-Evident. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):57-79.
John F. Wippel (2003). Norman Kretzmann on Aquinas's Attribution of Will and of Freedom to Create to God. Religious Studies 39 (3):287-298.
Coleen P. Zoller (2004). Determined but Free. Philosophy and Theology 16 (1):25-44.
Stephen David Ross (1994). Locality and Practical Judgment: Charity and Sacrifice. Fordham University Press.
Anthony Kenny (1976). Aquinas: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Charles Sayward (1988). W.D. Ross on Acting From Motives. Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (4):299-306.
Thomas Riplinger (2003). The Psychology of Natural and Supernatural Knowledge According to St. Thomas Aquinas. [T. Riplinger?].
Lawrence Dewan (1979). St. Thomas and the Possibles. New Scholasticism 53 (1):76-85.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads8 ( #369,407 of 1,790,225 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #266,358 of 1,790,225 )
How can I increase my downloads?