David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 53 (2):152 - 179 (2008)
I attempt to answer the question of what Aristotle's criteria for 'being a substance' are in the Categories. On the basis of close textual analysis, I argue that subjecthood, conceived in a certain way, is the criterion that explains why both concrete objects and substance universals must be regarded as substances. It also explains the substantial primacy of concrete objects. But subjecthood can only function as such a criterion if both the subjecthood of concrete objects and the subjecthood of substance universals can be understood as philosophically significant phenomena. By drawing on Aristotle's essentialism, I argue that such an understanding is possible: the subjecthood of substance universals cannot simply be reduced to that of primary substances. Primary and secondary substances mutually depend on each other for exercising their capacities to function as subjects. Thus, subjecthood can be regarded as a philosophically informative criterion for substancehood in the Categories.
|Keywords||SUBSTANCE SUBJECT ARISTOTLE CATEGORIES ESSENTIALISM|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Joseph E. Earley Sr (2009). How Chemistry Shifts Horizons: Element, Substance, and the Essential. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 11 (2):65-77.
Similar books and articles
S. Marc Cohen (2009). Substances. In Georgios Anagnostopoulos (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle. Blackwell-Wiley
Ian J. Thompson (1988). The Nature of Substance. Cogito 2 (2):17-19.
Catherine Jack Deavel (2003). Unity and Primary Substance for Aristotle. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:159-172.
T. Scaltsas (1994). Substances and Universals in Aristotle's Metaphysics. Cornell University Press.
David A. Denby (2007). A Note on Analysing Substancehood. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):473 – 484.
Montgomery Furth (1988). Substance, Form, and Psyche: An Aristotelean Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
John Kronen & Jacob Tuttle (2011). Composite Substances as True Wholes: Toward a Modified Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika Theory of Composite Substances. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):289-316.
Phil Corkum (2013). Substance and Independence in Aristotle. In B. Schnieder, A. Steinberg & M. Hoeltje (eds.), Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Supervenience, and Response-Dependence. Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Philosophia Verlag 36-67.
Markus Kohl (2008). Substancehood and Subjecthood in Aristotle's Categories. Phronesis 53 (2):152-179.
Peter Hacker (2004). Substance: Things and Stuffs. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78 (1):41–63.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #69,855 of 1,725,168 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #167,174 of 1,725,168 )
How can I increase my downloads?