David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 158 (2):289-311 (2012)
This essay explores the question of how to be good. My starting point is a thesis about moral worth that I’ve defended in the past: roughly, that an action is morally worthy if and only it is performed for the reasons why it is right. While I think that account gets at one important sense of moral goodness, I argue here that it fails to capture several ways of being worthy of admiration on moral grounds. Moral goodness is more multi-faceted. My title is intended to capture that multi-facetedness: the essay examines saintliness, heroism, and sagacity. The variety of our common-sense moral ideals underscores the inadequacy of any one account of moral admirableness, and I hope to illuminate the distinct roles these ideals play in our everyday understanding of goodness. Along the way, I give an account of what makes actions heroic, of whether such actions are supererogatory, and of what, if anything, is wrong with moral deference. At the close of the essay, I begin to explore the flipside of these ideals: villainy
|Keywords||Moral worth Motive of duty Moral saints Supererogation Moral deference Moral expertise|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Scanlon (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nomy Arpaly (2003). Unprincipled Virtue: An Inquiry Into Moral Agency. Oxford University Press.
Peter Singer (1972). Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Alison Hills (2009). Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology. Ethics 120 (1):94-127.
Joseph Raz (1975). Practical Reason and Norms. Hutchinson.
Citations of this work BETA
Alison Hills (2013). Moral Testimony. Philosophy Compass 8 (6):552-559.
Similar books and articles
Julia Markovits (2010). Acting for the Right Reasons. Philosophical Review 119 (2):201-242.
Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (2010). Untying a Knot From the Inside Out: Reflections on the “Paradox” of Supererogation. Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (2):29-63.
Peter Brian Barry (2009). Moral Saints, Moral Monsters, and the Mirror Thesis. American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):163 - 176.
Arthur J. Dyck (1973). A Unified Theory of Virtue and Obligation. Journal of Religious Ethics 1:37 - 52.
Philip Nickel (2001). Moral Testimony and its Authority. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):253-266.
Alastair Norcross (1997). Good and Bad Actions. Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.
Noell Birondo (2006). Moral Realism Without Values. Journal of Philosophical Research 31:81-102.
Alastair Norcross (2005). Contextualism for Consequentialists. Acta Analytica 20 (2):80-90.
Jill Hernandez (2010). Impermissibility and Kantian Moral Worth. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):403 - 419.
Jean Porter (1989). Moral Rules and Moral Actions: A Comparison of Aquinas and Modern Moral Theology. Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (1):123 - 149.
Vanessa Carbonell (2012). The Ratcheting-Up Effect. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):228-254.
Elizabeth Drummond Young (2013). God's Moral Goodness and Supererogation. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (2):83-95.
Gregory F. Mellema (2010). Moral Ideals and Virtue Ethics. Journal of Ethics 14 (2):173-180.
Kurt Gray & Daniel M. Wegner (2011). Dimensions of Moral Emotions. Emotion Review 3 (3):258-260.
Added to index2012-03-21
Total downloads99 ( #25,588 of 1,724,878 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #64,697 of 1,724,878 )
How can I increase my downloads?