Schleiermacher on the outpourings of the inner fire: Experiential expressivism and religious pluralism
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 40 (2):125-143 (2004)
Both in the Speeches and in The Christian Faith Schleiermacher offers a comprehensive theory of the nature of religion, grounding it in experience. In the Speeches Schleiermacher grounds religion in an original unity of consciousness that precedes the subject–object dichotomy; in The Christian Faith the feeling of absolute dependence is grounded in the immediate self-consciousness. I argue that Schleiermacher's theory offers a generally coherent account of how it is possible that differing religious traditions are all based on the same experience of the Absolute. I show how Schleiermacher's programme can respond successfully to three related contemporary objections to religious pluralism: (1) different religions make competing truth-claims about the nature of reality and they cannot all be right; (2) differing traditions cannot all be based on a similar religious experience because all experience is interpreted; and (3) the pluralist needs to have criteria in place distinguishing real and illusory religious experience, but such criteria are elusive. (Published Online April 21 2004).
|Keywords||Schleiermacher religion absolute dependence religious pluralism religious experience|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James M. Brandt (1989). Ritschl's Critique of Schleiermacher's Theological Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):51 - 72.
Georg Behrens (1998). Feeling of Absolute Dependence or Absolute Feeling of Dependence? (What Schleiermacher Really Said and Why It Matters). Religious Studies 34 (4):471-481.
Andrew Dole (2004). Schleiermacher and Otto on Religion. Religious Studies 40 (4):389-413.
Georg Behrens (1994). Schleiermacher Contra Lindbeck on the Status of Doctrinal Sentences. Religious Studies 30 (4):399 - 417.
Robert Adams (2011). Philosophical Themes in Schleiermacher's Christology. Philosophia 39 (3):449-460.
A. D. Smith (2008). Schleiermacher and Otto on Religion: A Reappraisal. Religious Studies 44 (3):295-313.
Eric S. Nelson (2004). Schleiermacher on Language, Religious Feeling, and the Ineffable. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):297-312.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads96 ( #18,561 of 1,696,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)20 ( #25,156 of 1,696,540 )
How can I increase my downloads?