Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (2):143 - 157 (2012)
|Abstract||In his new book The Idea of Justice, Amartya Sen argues that political theory should not consist only in the characterisation of ideal situations of perfect justice. In so doing, Sen is making, within the context of political theory, a similar argument to another he also made in economic theory, when crtiticising what he called the ?rational fool? of mainstream economics. Sen criticised the ideal and fictitious agent of mainstream economics, while advocating for a return to an integrated view of ethics and economics, which characterised many classical political economists who inspired Sen's theory of justice, from Adam Smith to Karl Marx. I will examine Sen's revival of classical political economy, and argue that a revival of classical political economy, which was undertaken earlier by Piero Sraffa, has much potential for bringing a more plural and realist perspective to economics|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Brian E. Butler (2010). Sen's The Idea of Justice: Back to the (Pragmatic) Future. Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2):219-229.
Pablo Gilabert (2012). Comparative Assessments of Justice, Political Feasibility, and Ideal Theory. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):39-56.
Amartya Sen (2009). The Idea of Justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Mozaffar Qizilbash (2009). Identity, Community, and Justice: Locating Amartya Sen's Work on Identity. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):251-266.
Evan Riley (2011). Against Sen Against Rawls On Justice. Indian Journal of Human Development 5 (1):211-221.
Martijn Boot (2012). The Aim of a Theory of Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):7-21.
J. S. Dryzek (2013). The Deliberative Democrat's Idea of Justice. European Journal of Political Theory 12 (4):329-346.
T. M. Scanlon (2001). Symposium on Amartya Sen's Philosophy: 3 Sen and Consequentialism. Economics and Philosophy 17 (1):39-50.
Joshua Anderson (2012). Sen and the Bhagavad Gita: Lessons for a Theory of Justice. Asian Philosophy 22 (1):63-74.
Philip Pettit (2009). Neorepublicanism and Sen's Economic, Legal, and Ethical Desiderata. In Reiko Gotoh & Paul Dumouchel (eds.), Against Injustice: The New Economics of Amartya Sen. Cambridge University Press.
Shatakshee Dhongde & Prasanta K. Pattanaik (2009). Preference, Choice, and Rationality : Amartya Sen's Critique of the Theory of Rational Choice in Economics. In Christopher W. Morris (ed.), Amartya Sen. Cambridge University Press.
Neri Salvadori & Rodolfo Signorino (2007). Piero Sraffa: Economic Reality, the Economist and Economic Theory: An Interpretation. Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (2):187-209.
Philip Pettit (2001). Symposium on Amartya Sen's Philosophy: 1 Capability and Freedom: A Defence of Sen. Economics and Philosophy 17 (1):1-20.
Marcel Hénaff (2009). The Prajâpati Test : Response to Amartya Sen. In Reiko Gotoh & Paul Dumouchel (eds.), Against Injustice: The New Economics of Amartya Sen. Cambridge University Press.
Greg Fried (2010). Teaching Arrow's Theorem. Teaching Philosophy 33 (2):173-186.
Added to index2012-06-24
Total downloads17 ( #78,052 of 722,874 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,756 of 722,874 )
How can I increase my downloads?