David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Topoi 13 (2):83-92 (1994)
In section 1 we argue that the adoption of a tenseless notion of truth entails a realistic view of propositions and provability. This view, in turn, opens the way to the intelligibility of theclassical meaning of the logical constants, and consequently is incompatible with the antirealism of orthodox intuitionism. In section 2 we show how what we call the potential intuitionistic meaning of the logical constants can be defined, on the one hand, by means of the notion of atemporal provability and, on the other, by means of the operator K of epistemic logic. Intuitionistic logic, as reconstructed within this perspective, turns out to be a part of epistemic logic, so that it loses its traditional foundational role, antithetic to that of classical logic. In section 3 we uphold the view that certain consequences of the adoption of atemporal notion of truth, despite their apparent oddity, are quite acceptable from an antirealist point of view.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michael A. E. Dummett (2000). Elements of Intuitionism. Oxford University Press.
Timothy Williamson (1988). Knowability and Constructivism. Philosophical Quarterly 38 (153):422-432.
Stewart Shapiro (ed.) (1985). Intentional Mathematics. Sole Distributors for the U.S.A. And Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Michael Dummett (1987). Reply to Dag Prawitz. In Barry Taylor (ed.), Michael Dummett: Contributions to Philosophy. Distributors for the United States and Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers 281--316.
Stewart Shapiro (1989). Intensional Mathematics. Philosophy of Science 56 (1):177-178.
Citations of this work BETA
W. Dean & H. Kurokawa (2010). From the Knowability Paradox to the Existence of Proofs. Synthese 176 (2):177 - 225.
Julien Murzi (2010). Knowability and Bivalence: Intuitionistic Solutions to the Paradox of Knowability. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 149 (2):269 - 281.
Julien Murzi (2010). Knowability and Bivalence: Intuitionistic Solutions to the Paradox of Knowability. Philosophical Studies 149 (2):269-281.
Similar books and articles
Zofia Kostrzycka & Marek Zaionc (2004). Statistics of Intuitionistic Versus Classical Logics. Studia Logica 76 (3):307 - 328.
Giambattista Amati, Luigia Carlucci-Aiello & Fiora Pirri (1997). Intuitionistic Autoepistemic Logic. Studia Logica 59 (1):103-120.
Gabriele Usberti (2006). Towards a Semantics Based on the Notion of Justification. Synthese 148 (3):675 - 699.
Frank Lucash (1984). What Spinoza's View of Freedom Should Have Been. Philosophy Research Archives 10:491-499.
Michael Hand (2010). Antirealism and Universal Knowability. Synthese 173 (1):25 - 39.
Peter Pagin (1994). Knowledge of Proofs. Topoi 13 (2):93-100.
Neil Tennant (1994). Intuitionistic Mathematics Does Not Needex Falso Quodlibet. Topoi 13 (2):127-133.
Yaroslav Shramko (2005). Dual Intuitionistic Logic and a Variety of Negations: The Logic of Scientific Research. Studia Logica 80 (2-3):347 - 367.
Cesare Cozzo (1994). What Can We Learn From the Paradox of Knowability? Topoi 13 (2):71--78.
Charles McCarty (2006). The Coherence of Antirealism. Mind 115 (460):947-956.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #94,825 of 1,790,385 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #50,831 of 1,790,385 )
How can I increase my downloads?