Towards a science of the individual: the Aristotelian search for scientific knowledge of individual entities
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):73-89 (2004)
This article seeks to take a step towards recognizing that science can deal with the concrete and individual as well as the universal. I shall concentrate on some of Aristotle’s texts, as there is a long tradition going back to Aristotle, according to which science deals only with the universal, although his work also contains texts of a very different tenor. He tries to improve the process of definition as an attempt to bring science closer to the concrete, but ends up realizing that there are some unreachable limits. There is, however, a second Aristotelian approach to the problem in Metaphysica M 10, a passage which takes scientific rapprochement to the individual further by introducing a distinction between science in potential and science in act. The former is universal, but the latter deals with individual substances and processes. Aristotle himself acknowledges here that in one sense science is universal and in another it is not, a position that raises important ontological and epistemological problems. Some suggestions are also offered concerning the kind of truth applicable to science in act, that is, practical truth.Author Keywords: Author Keywords: Aristotle; Practical truth; Science in act; Science of the individual; Definition
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michael Frede (1994). Aristotle's Notion of Potentiality in Metaphysics'. In T. Scaltsas, David Charles & Mary Louise Gill (eds.), Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle's Metaphysics. Oxford University Press 173--93.
Andrea Falcon (1996). Aristotle's Rules of Division in the Topics. Ancient Philosophy 16 (2):377-387.
Alfredo Marcos (2001). Aristotelian Perspectives for Post-Modern Reason. Epistemologia 24 (1):83-110.
James G. Lennox (1980). Aristotle on Genera, Species, and "The More and the Less". Journal of the History of Biology 13 (2):321 - 346.
D. M. Balme (1962). ΓΕΝΟΣ and ΕΙΔΟΣ in Aristotle's Biology. Classical Quarterly 12 (01):81-.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ingo Brigandt (2012). The Dynamics of Scientific Concepts: The Relevance of Epistemic Aims and Values. In Uljana Feest & Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Scientific Concepts and Investigative Practice. De Gruyter 3--75.
Francisco José Soler Gil (2004). Eine Welt Ohne Individuelle Entitäten? Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (2):331 - 349.
Claudia Wiesemann (1998). The Significance of Prognosis for a Theory of Medical Practice. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):253-261.
Joseph Diekemper (2015). The Ontology of Thisness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (1):49-71.
Herbert Simon (1995). Machine Discovery. Foundations of Science 1 (2):171-200.
Yan Yin (2008). 论个体自我认同危机. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 36:293-297.
Edward M. Engelmann (2007). The Mechanistic and the Aristotelian Orientations Toward Nature and Their Metaphysical Backgrounds. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):187-202.
Sahotra Sarkar (2008). A Note on Frequency Dependence and the Levels/Units of Selection. Biology and Philosophy 23 (2):217-228.
Giacomo Bonanno (1999). Varieties of Interpersonal Compatibility of Beliefs. In Jelle Gerbrandy, Maarten Marx, Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema (eds.), Essays dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the occasion of his 50th birthday. Amsterdam University Press
Ruth L. Saw (1952). Our Knowledge of Individuals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52:167-188.
Tim Lewens (2001). Sex and Selection: A Reply to Matthen. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):589-598.
J. Weinstein (2009). Democracy, Individual Rights and the Regulation of Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):407-429.
Jared Michael Jones (2005). Science and Religion: A Search for Synergism. Dissertation, Texas A&M University
Phil Corkum (2013). Substance and Independence in Aristotle. In B. Schnieder, A. Steinberg & M. Hoeltje (eds.), Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Supervenience, and Response-Dependence. Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Philosophia Verlag 36-67.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads8 ( #381,178 of 1,792,630 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,764 of 1,792,630 )
How can I increase my downloads?