David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (3-4):245-273 (2011)
I show the sense in which the concept of history as a human science affects our theory of the natural sciences and, therefore, our theory of the unity of the physical and human sciences. The argument proceeds by way of reviewing the effect of the Darwinian contribution regarding teleologism and of post-Darwinian paleonanthropology on the transformation of the primate members of Homo sapiens into societies of historied selves. The strategy provides a novel way of recovering the unity of the sciences: by construing the physical sciences themselves as human sciences - and, therefore, as themselves historied
|Keywords||human sciences physical sciences self history Cassirer Darwin|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wilhelm Dilthey (1988). Introduction to the Human Sciences: An Attempt to Lay a Foundation for the Study of Society and History. Wayne State University Press.
Mikael Stenmark (2009). Three Theories of Human Nature. Zygon 44 (4):894-920.
Herbert Gintis (2004). Towards the Unity of the Human Behavioral Sciences. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):37-57.
Jeffrey Foss (2007). Game Theory for Reformation of Behavioral Science Based on a Mistake. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):24-25.
Calvin O. Schrag (1980). Radical Reflection and the Origin of the Human Sciences. Purdue University Press.
Joseph Becker (1993). The Essential Nature of the Method of the Natural Sciences: Response to A. T. Nuyen's "Truth, Method, and Objectivity: Husserl and Gadamer on Scientific Method". Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):73-76.
Geoffrey Hawthorn (1991). Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Karsten R. Stueber (2012). Understanding Versus Explanation? How to Think About the Distinction Between the Human and the Natural Sciences. Inquiry 55 (1):17 - 32.
Alix Cohen (2009). Kant and the Human Sciences: Biology, Anthropology and History. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lester Embree (2004). A Problem in Schutz's Theory of the Historical Sciences with an Illustration From the Women's Liberation Movement. Human Studies 27 (3):281-306.
P. A. Russell & D. P. Carey (2000). Niche Construction at the “Workface” of the Human Behavioural Sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):158-158.
Carlos Eduardo Maldonado & Universidad Rosario Business School Submittedelr, In Which Sense Can We Talk About a Dialogue Between the Sciences? An Essay Concerning the New Sciences of Complexity.
Nicholas S. Thompson (1998). Reintroducing “Reintroducing Group Selection to the Human Behavioral Sciences”to BBS Readers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):304-305.
Brian Fay (2006). For Science in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):227-240.
Added to index2010-11-13
Total downloads62 ( #35,445 of 1,696,586 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #343,026 of 1,696,586 )
How can I increase my downloads?