The Crossing of the Visible
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Stanford University Press (2004)
Painting, according to Jean-Luc Marion, is a central topic of concern for philosophy, particularly phenomenology. For the question of painting is, at its heart, a question of visibility—of appearance. As such, the painting is a privileged case of the phenomenon; the painting becomes an index for investigating the conditions of appearance—or what Marion describes as “phenomenality” in general. In The Crossing of the Visible, Marion takes up just such a project. The natural outgrowth of his earlier reflections on icons, these four studies carefully consider the history of painting—from classical to contemporary—as a fund for phenomenological reflection on the conditions of (in)visibility. Ranging across artists from Raphael to Rothko, Caravaggio to Pollock, The Crossing of the Visible offers both a critique of contemporary accounts of the visual and a constructive alternative. According to Marion, the proper response to the “nihilism” of postmodernity is not iconoclasm, but rather a radically iconic account of the visual and the arts that opens them to the invisible
|Keywords||Visual perception Perspective Painting Philosophy Phenomenology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$19.29 new (13% off) $21.95 direct from Amazon $25.15 used Amazon page|
|Call number||ND1140.M3513 2004|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ian Rottenberg (2014). Fine Art as Preparation for Christian Love. Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (2):243-262.
Similar books and articles
Christian Lotz (2009). Representation or Sensation? A Critique of Deleuze’s Philosophy of Painting. Sympsium. Canadian Journal for Continental Philosophy 13 (1):59-73.
Jean-Luc Marion (2008). The Visible and the Revealed. Fordham University Press.
Véronique Marion Fóti (ed.) (1996). Merleau-Ponty: Difference, Materiality, Painting. Humanities Press.
Joseph Margolis (2009). The Arts and the Definition of the Human: Toward a Philosophical Anthropology. Stanford University Press.
Eliane Escoubas (2006). Derrida and the Truth of Drawing: Another Copernican Revolution? Research in Phenomenology 36 (1):201-214.
Michael Purcell (2010). IJPR: Beyond the Limit and Limiting the Beyond. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):121-138.
Robert Hopkins (2004). Painting, Sculpture, Sight, and Touch. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):149-166.
Andrew Benjamin (2011). On the Image of Painting. Research in Phenomenology 41 (2):181-205.
David Johnson (2009). Merleau-Ponty and the Other World of Painting: A Response. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 40 (1):89-97.
Nigel Wentworth (2004). The Phenomenology of Painting. Cambridge University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?