Graduate studies at Western
Inquiry 21 (1):33-42 (2001)
|Abstract||The close relationship that thinking bears to doing is perhaps the foundational idea in the plilosophy of education. This idea makes its first systematic appearance in the thought of Charles S. Peirce. In order to appreciate Peirce’s discovery, we cannot interpret hirn through the eyes of Richard Rorty, who obscures Peirce’s insight by making distinctions Peirce would have resisted. thought and action coincide most essentially in Peirce’s concept of the “scientific” method for fixing beliefs. This method is the most reliable guide for justifying thought because it requires humans to act upon the world. Only such action helps reveal a steadily friendlier and more dependable environment. Rorty misses this idea of Peirce’s in so far as he clings to a radically romantic conception of creativity|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gabriele Gava (2011). Peirce's 'Prescision' as a Transcendental Method. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (2):231 - 253.
Kenneth R. Merrill (1991). Hume's "of Miracles," Peirce, and the Balancing of Likelihoods. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):85 - 113.
Andrew Garnar (2006). Power, Action, Signs: Between Peirce and Foucault. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):347-366.
Vincent G. Potter (1967/1997). Charles S. Peirce on Norms & Ideals. Fordham University Press.
Nikolay Ivanov (2007). Grounding Scientific Knowledge and Religious Belief in the Context of Charle Peirce's Metaphysics. In Monica Merutiu, Bogdan Dicher & Adrian Ludusan (eds.), Philosophy of Pragmatism. Religious Premises, Moral Issues and Historical Impact. Efes.
Jaime Nubiola (2008). Peirce and Whitehead. In Weber (ed.), Handbook of Whiteheadian Process Thought.
Robert F. Almeder (1971). The Idealism of Charles S. Peirce. Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (4):477-484.
Jaime Nubiola (2008). Teaching Peirce in Spain. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):219-222.
Jaime Nubiola (1996). Scholarship on the Relations Between Ludwig Wittgenstein and Charles S. Peirce. In María Cerezo & Ignacio Angelelli (eds.), Studies on the History of Logic. Proceedings of the III Symposium on History of Logic.
Kenneth W. Stikkers (2011). The Politics of Survival: Peirce, Affectivity, and Social Criticism. The Pluralist 6 (2):74-80.
Shannon Dea (2006). &Quot;merely a Veil Over the Living Thought&Quot;: Mathematics and Logic in Peirce's Forgotten Spinoza Review. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (4):501-517.
James Liszka (2007). Teleology and Semiosis: Commentary on T.L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):636 - 644.
Rosa Maria Mayorga (2013). Realism and Individualism. Charles S. Peirce and the Threat of Modern Nominalism by Mateusz Wsz. Oleksy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (3):387-391.
H. G. Callaway (1994). Review: Ludwig Nagel, Charles Sanders Peirce. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30 (3):722-727.
Gabriele Gava (2008). The Purposefulness in Our Thought: A Kantian Aid to Understanding Some Essential Features of Peirce. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):pp. 699-727.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads3 ( #213,434 of 731,079 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 731,079 )
How can I increase my downloads?