British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (5):897-919 (2009)
|Abstract||I argue that, contrary to how he is often read, Spinoza did not believe that the mind and the body were numerically identical. This means that we must find some alternative reading for his claims that they are 'one and the same thing' (I describe three such alternative readings).|
|Keywords||Spinoza 'one and the same' mind body causation attribute|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Della Rocca (2007). Spinoza and the Metaphysics of Scepticism. Mind 116 (464):851-874.
Frank Lucash (2006). What is the Relationship Between Ideas in the Human Mind and Ideas in the Mind of God for Spinoza? Sophia 45 (1):25-41.
Benny Shanon (2008). Mind-Body, Body-Mind: Two Distinct Problems. Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.
Olli Koistinen & J. I. Biro (eds.) (2002). Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes. Oxford University Press.
Don Garrett (2009). Spinoza on the Essence of the Human Body and the Part of the Mind That is Eternal. In Olli Koistinen (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Stuart F. Spicker (1970). The Philosophy of the Body. Chicago,Quadrangle Books.
Michael Della Rocca (1996). Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza. Oxford University Press.
Steven Nadler (2008). Spinoza and Consciousness. Mind 117 (467):575-601.
Added to index2010-04-24
Total downloads81 ( #11,707 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?