Cambridge University Press (2006)
|Abstract||Wayne Martin traces attempts to develop theories of judgment in British Empiricism, the logical tradition stemming from Kant, nineteenth-century psychologism, recent experimental neuropsychology, and the phenomenological tradition associated with Brentano, Husserl and Heidegger. His reconstruction of vibrant but largely forgotten nineteenth-century debates links Kantian approaches to judgment with twentieth-century phenomenological accounts. He also shows that the psychological, logical and phenomenological dimensions of judgment are not only equally important, but fundamentally interlinked.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$36.60 new (66% off) $91.98 direct from Amazon (17% off) $96.35 used (13% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BF447.M29 2006|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael M. Tavuzzi (1982). Existential Judgment and Transcendental Reduction: A Critical Analysis of Edmund Husserl's Phaenomenologische Fundamentalbetrachtung (Ideen I, [Paragraphen] 27-62). [REVIEW] Massimo.
Albena Azmanova (2012). The Scandal of Reason: A Critical Theory of Political Judgment. Columbia University Press.
Nicholas Joll (2010). Theories of Judgment: Psychology, Logic, Phenomenology – Wayne M. Martin. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):658-660.
Hans Sluga (2008). Review: Wayne Martin on Judgment. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):109 - 119.
R. Lanier Anderson (2008). Review: Comments on Wayne Martin, Theories of Judgment. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):91 - 108.
Hans Sluga (2008). Wayne Martin on Judgment. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):109 - 119.
Günter Zöller (2008). Kant and the Problem of Existential Judgment: Critical Comments on Wayne Martin's Theories of Judgment. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):121 - 134.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #53,586 of 722,871 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,757 of 722,871 )
How can I increase my downloads?