David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The 1980s and 1990s witnessed an extraordinary amount of police, legislative, judicial, scholarly, and community activity around hate crime. Such activity was attributable to a new "anti-hate-crime movement," conditions for which were created by the convergence in previous decades of two very different social movements - civil rights and victims' rights. This anti-hate-crime movement has been radiply assimilated into the institutions of criminal justice, with the result that anti-hate-crime measures now reflect the culture and priorities of those institutions. The civil rights and victims' rights movements created collective beliefs, structural resources, and political opportunities that facilitated the emergence of a social movement organized around hate crime and its victims. Hate crime laws were the most visible manifestation of the movement's legal impact, but represent but one aspect of a larger legal and societal response. Much of the success of the movement is attributable to the fact that anti-hate-crime measures fit easily into the values of the criminal justice system; however, that system remains weighted against hate crime victims and their communities. For target communities, the desire to be free from hate crime is inseparable from the desire to be free. Anti-hate-crime measures too frequently address the former but not the latter. To acheive its goal of systemic transformation of criminal justice, the anti-hate-crime movement must engage in critical self-reflection, invest in movement infrastructure, and recommit to challenging the very institutions of criminal justice with which it now cooperates.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Susan Gellman (1992). “Brother, You Can't Go to Jail for What You're Thinking”: Motives, Effects, and “Hate Crime” Laws. Criminal Justice Ethics 11 (2):24-29.
Mohamad Al-Hakim (2010). Making Room for Hate Crime Legislation in Liberal Societies. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):341-358.
David Boonin (2011). Should Race Matter?: Unusual Answers to the Usual Questions. Cambridge University Press.
Sonu Bedi (2011). Why a Criminal Prohibition on Sex Selective Abortions Amounts to a Thought Crime. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):349-360.
Heidi M. Hurd (2001). Why Liberals Should Hate ``Hate Crime Legislation''. Law and Philosophy 20 (2):215 - 232.
M. H. (2001). Why Liberals Should Hate ``Hate Crime Legislation''. Law and Philosophy 20 (2):215-232.
Christopher Heath Wellman (2006). A Defense of Stiffer Penalties for Hate Crimes. Hypatia 21 (2):62-80.
Larry Alexander (1992). The ADL Hate Crime Statute and the First Amendment. Criminal Justice Ethics 11 (2):49-51.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #200,376 of 1,725,158 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,161 of 1,725,158 )
How can I increase my downloads?