Graduate studies at Western
Mind and Language 4 (4):376-425 (2002)
|Abstract||A common objection to sense-datum theories of perception is that they cannot give an adequate account of the fact that introspection indicates that our sensory experiences are directed on, or are about, the mind-independent entities in the world around us, that our sense experience is transparent to the world. In this paper I point out that the main force of this claim is to point out an explanatory challenge to sense-datum theories|
|Keywords||Epistemology Experience Intentionality Sense Data Transparency|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Tye (2002). Representationalism and the Transparency of Experience. Noûs 36 (1):137-51.
Bernard Molyneux (2009). Why Experience Told Me Nothing About Transparency. Noûs 43 (1):116-136.
Pierre Livet (2005). What is Transparency? Psyche 11 (5).
Paul Coates, Sense-Data. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Thomas Raleigh (2009). Understanding How Experience "Seems&Quot;. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 5 (2):67-78.
John O'Dea (2008). Transparency and the Unity of Experience. In E. Wright (ed.), The Case for Qualia. MIT Press.
Ernest Sosa (1986). Experience and Intentionality. Philosophical Topics 14 (1):67-83.
Clare Batty (2010). Scents and Sensibilia. American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):103-118.
Amy Kind (2003). What's so Transparent About Transparency? Philosophical Studies 115 (3):225-244.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads274 ( #803 of 750,430 )
Recent downloads (6 months)20 ( #6,373 of 750,430 )
How can I increase my downloads?