The What, the How, and the Why: The Explanation of Ernst Mach
Behavior and Philosophy 31:181 - 192 (2003)
| Abstract | Putative distinctions between explanation and description constitute a very old issue in the sciences. Behavior analysts commonly call their science "descriptive" as opposed to "explanatory." One obvious difficulty here is to achieve any agreement on the meaning or use of these terms. Without some agreement, debate is pointless. I examine various uses of these terms and consider whether they have any clearly distinctive meanings in the actual conduct of a science. Many behaviorists are inspired (via Skinner) by Ernst Mach to view science as discription, but I will argue that Mach's use of the term "description" corresponds to what most scientists would call "explanation." Thus, on this basis at least, behaviorists are unjustified in their opposition to science as "explanation.". | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesErik C. Banks (2012). Sympathy for the Devil: Reconsidering Ernst Mach's Empiricism. Metascience 21 (2):321-330.
Erik C. Banks (2012). Sympathy for the Devil: Reconsidering Ernst Mach's Empiricism. Metascience 21 (2):321-330.
Scott Edgar (2013). The Limits of Experience and Explanation: F. A. Lange and Ernst Mach on Things in Themselves. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (1):100-121.
Nadeem J. Z. Hussain (2004). Reading Nietzsche Through Ernst Mach. In Gregory Moore & Thomas H. Brobjer (eds.), Nietzche and Science. Ashgate.
Erik C. Banks (2001). Ernst Mach and the Episode of the Monocular Depth Sensations. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 37 (4):327-348.
Susan G. Sterrett (1998). Sounds Like Light. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 29 (1):1-35.
Ernst Mach (1939). Uit: Ernst Mach, Analyse der Empfindungen. Synthese 4 (2):106 - 107.
John Blackmore (1989). Ernst Mach Leaves 'the Church of Physics'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (4):519-540.
Ralf Goeres (2004). Sensualistischer Phänomenalismus Und Denkökonomie. Zur Wissenschaftskonzeption Ernst Machs. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 35 (1):41-70.
Pietro Gori (2009). The Usefulness of Substances. Knowledge, Science and Metaphysics in Nietzsche and Mach. Nietzsche Studien 38:111-155.
Denis Fisette (2012). Phenomenology and Phenomenalism: Ernst Mach and the Genesis of Husserl's Phenomenology. Axiomathes 22 (1):53-74.
Ernst Mach (1939). Ernst Mach En Onze Tijd. Synthese 4 (2):96 - 105.
Manjulekha Bhattacharya (1972). Ernst Mach: Neutral Monism. Studi Internazionali Di Filosofia 4:145-182.
Franz Brentano (1964). Zwei Briefe an E. Mach. In K. P. Heller (ed.), Ernst Mach: Wegbereiter der modernen Physik. Springer.
Ernst Mach (1906). A Letter From Professor Mach. The Monist 16 (4):627-629.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-05-29Total downloads3 ( #202,056 of 549,546 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
