Verificationism in the tractatus?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In the following, I will mean by ‘verificationism’ the doctrine according to which understanding a sentence entails that one knows how to verify it, i.e. how to determine its truth value. It is not the only possible meaning of ‘verificationism’, nor perhaps the most common. However, it is with reference to this sense of ‘verificationism’ that I am going to ask the question whether the Tractatus is committed to verificationism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Panu Raatikainen (2003). Is Quine a Verificationist? Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):399-409.
JC Beall (2000). Fitch's Proof, Verificationism, and the Knower Paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2):241 – 247.
Jerry A. Fodor (1978). Tom Swift and His Procedural Grandmother. Cognition 6 (September):229-47.
Robert Almeder (1979). Peirce on Meaning. Synthese 41 (1):1 - 24.
Wlodek Rabinowicz & Krister Segerberg (1994). Actual Truth, Possible Knowledge. Topoi 13 (2):101-115.
Samir Okasha (2001). Verificationism, Realism and Scepticism. Erkenntnis 55 (3):371-385.
Dennis W. Stampe (1986). Verificationism and a Causal Account of Meaning. Synthese 69 (October):107-37.
Dag Prawitz (1994). Quine and Verificationism. Inquiry 37 (4):487 – 494.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #201,648 of 1,098,601 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?