David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Law and Philosophy 28 (2):163 - 201 (2009)
In his last papers about deontic logic, von Wright sustained that there is no genuine logic of norms. We argue in this paper that this striking statement by the father of deontic logic should not be understood as a death sentence to the subject. Rather, it indicates a profound change in von Wright's understanding about the epistemic and ontological role of logic in the field of norms. Instead of a logical constructivism of deontic systems revealing a necessary structure of prescriptive discourse, which marked his earlier efforts, he adopted the view that such systems should be seem as mere objects of comparison, i.e. as providing practical standards of rationality for normgiving activity. Within such view he proposed an interpretation of standard deontic logic in such a way to free deontic logicians from the philosophical difficulties related to the so-called Jørgensen's dilemma and deontic paradoxes. This effort, as we claim in the present paper, is an application of Wittgenstein's therapeutic method to dissolve philosophical difficulties caused by the use of logical tools to model relations between norms
|Keywords||Law Logic Political Science Social Sciences, general Philosophy of Law Law Theory/Law Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Hector-Neri Castañeda (1981). The Paradoxes of Deontic Logic: The Simplest Solution to All of Them in One Fell Swoop. In Risto Hilpinen (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic. 37--85.
P. M. S. Hacker (1996/1997). Wittgenstein's Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Blackwell.
Jaakko Hintikka (1977). Language‐Games. Dialectica 31 (3‐4):225-245.
Jørgen Jørgensen (1976). Reflexions on Logic and Language. Erkenntnis 8 (1):218-228.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
G. H. von Wright (1951). Deontic Logic. Mind 60 (237):1-15.
Georg Henrik von Wright (1999). Deontic Logic: A Personal View. Ratio Juris 12 (1):26-38.
G. H. von Wright (1983). Norms of Higher Order. Studia Logica 42 (2-3):119 - 127.
Richard Evans (2010). Introducing Exclusion Logic as a Deontic Logic. DEON 2010 10 (1):179-195.
Sven Ove Hansson (1997). Situationist Deontic Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):423-448.
Berislav Žarnić (2010). A Logical Typology of Normative Systems. Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy 2 (1):30-40.
Georg Henrik von Wright (1981). A New System of Deontic Logic. In Risto Hilpinen (ed.), Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Sold and Distributed in the U.S.A. And Canada by Kluwer Boston.
Georg Henrik von Wright (1981). Deontic Logic and the Theory of Conditions. In Risto Hilpinen (ed.), Critica. Sold and Distributed in the U.S.A. And Canada by Kluwer Boston. 3 - 31.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #127,035 of 1,692,868 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #182,244 of 1,692,868 )
How can I increase my downloads?