Philosophical Studies 127 (3):415 - 457 (2006)
|Abstract||Correspondence theories are frequently either too vaguely expressed – “true statements correspond to the way things are in the world,” or implausible – “true statements mirror raw, mind-independent reality.” I address this problem by developing features and roles that ought to characterize what I call ldquo;modest” correspondence theories. Of special importance is the role of correspondence in directing our responses to cases of suspected non-factuality; lack of straightforward correspondence shows the need for, and guides us in our choice of, various kinds of reconstrual projects. This, I argue, is in contrast to the approaches suggested by deflationism and coherence, and thus modest correspondence theories are appropriately distinct from rivals.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stewart Candlish, The Identity Theory of Truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hans Johann Glock (2006). Truth in the Tractatus. Synthese 148 (2):345 - 368.
Julian Dodd (2000). An Identity Theory of Truth. St. Martin's Press.
Schick (1985). In Defense of the Correspondence Theory. Philosophy Research Archives 11:319-334.
James O. Young (2009). Truth, Correspondence and Deflationism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):563-575.
D. Patterson (2003). What is a Correspondence Theory of Truth? Synthese 137 (3):421 - 444.
Patricia Marino (2008). Toward a Modest Correspondence Theory of Truth: Predicates and Properties. Dialogue 47 (01):81-.
Kenneth F. Schaffner (1969). Correspondence Rules. Philosophy of Science 36 (3):280-290.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #71,150 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?