Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):626-627 (1999)
|Abstract||The perceptual symbol system view assumes that perceptual representations have a role-argument structure. A role-argument structure is often incorporated into amodal symbol systems in order to explain conceptual functions like abstraction and rule use. The power of perceptual symbol systems to support conceptual functions is likewise rooted in its use of structure. On Barsalou's account, this capacity to use structure (in the form of frames) must be innate.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rolf A. Zwaan, Robert A. Stanfield & Carol J. Madden (1999). Perceptual Symbols in Language Comprehension: Can an Empirical Case Be Made? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):636-637.
Louis C. Charland (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems and Emotion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):612-613.
W. Martin Davies (2004). Amodal or Perceptual Symbol Systems: A False Dichotomy? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):162-163.
Arthur B. Markman & Eric Dietrich (2000). Extending the Classical View of Representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (12):470-475.
Arthur B. Markman & Eric Dietrich, Something Old, Something New: Extending the Classical View of Representation.
Bipin Indurkhya (1999). Creativity of Metaphor in Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):621-622.
Lawrence W. Barsalou (1999). Perceptions of Perceptual Symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):637-660.
Ruediger Oehlmann (1999). Can Metacognition Be Explained in Terms of Perceptual Symbol Systems? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):629-630.
William F. Brewer (1999). Perceptual Symbols: The Power and Limitations of a Theory of Dynamic Imagery and Structured Frames. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):611-612.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads67 ( #16,158 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)33 ( #3,540 of 722,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?