David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philo 1 (1):63-73 (1998)
A strong case can be made that the initial probability of the Resurrection is very low even if one accepts the existence of a theistic God. Even sophisticated theists who maintain that God performs miracles believe that these are rare initially improbable events. Consequently, strong evidence is needed to overcome this initial improbability. In the case of the Resurrection there is no plausible theory why this event should have occurred; moreover, even if there is, it is unlikely that it would have happened at the particular time and place it did
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stephen T. Davis (1999). Is Belief in the Resurrection Rational? Philo 2 (1):51-61.
Stephen T. Davis (2000). The Rationality of Resurrection for Christians. Philo 3 (1):41-51.
Michael Martin (2000). Christianity and the Rationality of the Resurrection. Philo 3 (1):52-62.
James A. Keller (1988). Comtemporary Christian Doubts About the Resurrection. Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):40-60.
Eric Steinhart (2008). The Revision Theory of Resurrection. Religious Studies 44 (1):63-81.
Daniel Howard-Snyder (2003). On Hume's Philosophical Case Against Miracles. In Christopher Bernard (ed.), God Matters: Readings in the Philosophy of Religion. Longman Publications.
Richard Swinburne (2005). The Probability of the Resurrection. In Andrew Dole & Andrew Chignell (eds.), God and the Ethics of Belief: New Essays in Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge University Press.
James F. Ross (2001). Together with the Body I Love. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:1-18.
Marc A. Hight (2007). Berkeley and Bodily Resurrection. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):443-458.
R. Douglas Geivett (2001). Replies to Evan Fales: On the Evidence of Miracles and the Historicity of the Resurrection. Philosophia Christi 3 (1):53 - 60.
Robert Greg Cavin (1995). Is There Sufficient Historical Evidence to Establish the Resurrection of Jesus? Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):361-379.
Jordan Howard Sobel (2009). Lotteries and Miracles. In Jonathan L. Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion: Volume 2. Oup Oxford.
Michael Potts (1998). Aquinas, Hell, and the Resurrection of the Damned. Faith and Philosophy 15 (3):341-351.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads25 ( #79,709 of 1,410,123 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,589 of 1,410,123 )
How can I increase my downloads?