David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 57 (1):41-46 (2002)
This paper defends Humeanism: the view that an agent has a reason for an intentional action if and only if it fulfills, or is a means to fulfilling, a current desire of that agent. Thomas Nagel presents an example involving a short-lived desire for eating a persimmon tomorrow. He claims that, contrary to Humeanism, this example is a clear case of irrationality. Furthermore, the Humean cannot simply dismiss all current desires with future objects, because desires of this sort are crucial to the Humean account of prudence. I respond that, correctly understood, Humeanism can simultaneously account for prudent conduct and other conduct motivated by present desires with future objects.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daan Evers (2013). In Defence of Proportionalism. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):313-320.
Jonathan Dancy (1995). Why There Is Really No Such Thing as the Theory of Motivation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:1-18.
Michelle Mason (2005). Hume and Humeans on Practical Reason. Hume Studies 31 (2):347-378.
Michael Ridge (1998). Humean Intentions. American Philosophical Quarterly 35 (2):157-178.
Yonatan Shemmer (2004). Desiring at Will and Humeanism in Practical Reason. Philosophical Studies 119 (3):265-294.
Donald C. Hubin (1999). What's Special About Humeanism. Noûs 33 (1):30-45.
Achim Lohmar (2008). The Failure of Pure Cognitivism. Grazer Philosophische Studien 76 (1):149-166.
Steven Daskal (2010). Absolute Value as Belief. Philosophical Studies 148 (2):221 - 229.
A. Byrne & A. Hajek (1997). David Hume, David Lewis, and Decision Theory. Mind 106 (423):411-728.
Steven Arkonovich (2001). Defending Desire: Scanlon's Anti-Humeanism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):499-519.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #152,927 of 1,096,816 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #164,128 of 1,096,816 )
How can I increase my downloads?