David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Global Ethics 6 (1):57-70 (2011)
This article develops the argument that non-cosmopolitan considerations of justice justify relief of sovereign debt for highly indebted poor states. In particular, the article claims that considerations of national determination warrant some debt-forgiveness in the backdrop of unfair terms of global interaction. In a context of inequality, poor countries cannot generally afford to disregard the costs of ignoring the interests of the wealthiest states. Patterns of unbalanced interaction undermine national self-determination by limiting the poor countries' effective capacity to choose between different policies to achieve development and other worthy goals. In concrete, this article suggests that unequal terms of interaction constrain national self-determination by making of sovereign debt an 'escape mechanism' in the absence of rival alternatives to palliate the effects of underdevelopment and related afflictions, despite the causes of sovereign debt being partly domestic, possibly. Thus, this paper views national self-determination as dependent on the availability of acceptable (non-unbearably burdensome) policy options on the part of states
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Scanlon (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
John Rawls (1971/2005). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Thomas Nagel (2005). The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113–147.
David Miller (2001). On Nationality. Mind 110 (438):512-516.
Charles R. Beitz (1982). Political Theory and International Relations. Ethics 92 (4):710-719.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas I. Palley (2003). Sovereign Debt Restructuring Proposals: A Comparative Look. Ethics and International Affairs 17 (2):26–33.
Barry Herman (2007). Introduction: The Players and the Game of Sovereign Debt. Ethics and International Affairs 21 (1):5–32.
Barry Herman (2007). The Players and the Game of Sovereign Debt. Ethics and International Affairs 21 (s1):9-39.
Alexander W. Cappelen, Rune Jansen Hagen & and Bertil Tungodden (2007). National Responsibility and the Just Distribution of Debt Relief. Ethics and International Affairs 21 (1):69–83.
Christian Barry (2011). Sovereign Debt, Human Rights, and Policy Conditionality. Journal of Political Philosophy 19 (3):282-305.
Alison M. Jaggar (2002). A Feminist Critique of the Alleged Southern Debt. Hypatia 17 (4):119-142.
Bernard Snoy (1989). Ethical Issues in International Lending. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (8):635 - 639.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads18 ( #203,425 of 1,796,225 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,795 of 1,796,225 )
How can I increase my downloads?