Improving the analogies in contralife arguments: The consistency of catholic teachings about regulating births

Heythrop Journal 49 (3):442-452 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses the analogies that proponents of contralife arguments have used to distinguish contraception from periodic abstinence or natural family planning. I criticize these analogies and present a new analogy that better illustrates how contraception can be contralife when periodic abstinence are not.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#237,149)

6 months
12 (#178,599)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lawrence Masek
Ohio Dominican University

Citations of this work

Analogical Reasoning in Ethics.Georg Spielthenner - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):861-874.

Add more citations