Improving the analogies in contralife arguments
Heythrop Journal 49 (3):442-452 (2008)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCameron Shelley (1999). Multiple Analogies in Archaeology. Philosophy of Science 66 (4):579-605.
Alex Levine (2009). Partition Epistemology and Arguments From Analogy. Synthese 166 (3):593 - 600.
Bjørn Hofmann, Jan Helge Solbakk & Søren Holm (2006). Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks: The Role of Analogies in Bioethical Analysis and Argumentation Concerning New Technologies. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (5):397-413.
C. Stephen Layman (1988). Tritheism and the Trinity. Faith and Philosophy 5 (3):291-298.
Dirk Schlimm (2008). Two Ways of Analogy: Extending the Study of Analogies to Mathematical Domains. Philosophy of Science 75 (2):178-200.
Paul F. A. Bartha (2010). By Parallel Reasoning: The Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments. Oxford University Press.
Lawrence Masek (2006). A Contralife Argument Against Altered Nuclear Transfer. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 6 (2):235-240.
Lawrence Masek (2011). The Contralife Argument and the Principle of Double Effect. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 11 (1):83-97.
Mikko Salmela (2011). Can Emotion Be Modelled on Perception? Dialectica 65 (1):1-29.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads17 ( #71,134 of 549,128 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
