David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Today 54 (2):138-52 (2010)
Heidegger claims in Being and Time that Bergson fails to overcome traditional ontology because his concept of time is fundamentally Aristotelian. On the basis of this hasty dismissal, it is tempting to conclude that Heidegger was not terribly interested in Bergson or that he only wanted to prevent readers from confusing his view of time with Bergson’s. To the contrary, a survey of Heidegger’s early lectures and writings on the issue of time reveals a strong interest in Bergson and an acknowledgement of his importance as a pivotal thinker concerning time. In fact, Heidegger appropriates key aspects of Bergsonism, such as Bergson’s way of contrasting the measurement of time and its experiential origins, revealing that his ambivalence toward Bergson initially arises from concerns about his method and his concept of life rather than his understanding of time.
|Keywords||time duration temporality Bergson Heidegger|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mark Sinclair (2014). Inheritance, Originality and the Will: Bergson and Heidegger on Creation. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (5):655-675.
Similar books and articles
Rebecca Hill (2008). Phallocentrism in Bergson: Life and Matter. Deleuze Studies 2 (Suppl):123-136.
Henri Bergson (1913). Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. Dover Publications.
Jesse Matz (2011). 'Quelque Romancier Hardi': The Literary Bergsonist. The European Legacy 16 (7):937 - 951.
Robin Durie (2010). Wandering Among Shadows: The Discordance of Time in Levinas and Bergson. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (4):371-392.
David Scott (2006). The “Concept of Time” and the “Being of the Clock”: Bergson, Einstein, Heidegger, and the Interrogation of the Temporality of Modernism. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 39 (2):183-213.
Leonard Lawlor (2003). The Ontology of Memory: Bergson's Reversal of Platonism. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (1):69-102.
William Blattner (1999). Heidegger's Temporal Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
Theodore R. Schatzki (2006). The Time of Activity. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (2):155-182.
James Gilbert-Walsh (2010). Revisiting the Concept of Time: Archaic Perplexity in Bergson and Heidegger. [REVIEW] Human Studies 33 (2):173-190.
Added to index2010-07-20
Total downloads112 ( #34,514 of 1,906,979 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #40,510 of 1,906,979 )
How can I increase my downloads?