David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):333-350 (2004)
It is a common view that Ockham’s critique of Scotus’s position on the issue of contingency is “devastating,” for it seems obvious that a possibility that does notactualize is simply no possibility. This rejection however does not commit Ockham to necessitarism, for the consideration of the temporal discontinuity of volitions should suffice to save contingency. But does it? Is it the case that diachronic volitions (which Scotus also acknowledges) are sufficient?This essay argues that (1) the debate between Ockham and Scotus is not to be reduced to a logical disagreement (Scotus’s and Ockham’s modal logics are actually substantially similar) but is properly ontological inasmuch as it concerns the reduction and eventual identification of being with actuality and of actuality with reality in the sense of manifest; (2) the retrograding movement of truth from the present (Ockham’s 3rd suppositio) entails a temporal gap between present and future; and (3) Ockham’s solution depends on a conception of the will that cannot simply be identified with, and accounted for in terms of successive volitions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael J. Cholbi (2003). Contingency and Divine Knowledge in Ockham. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):81-91.
Pascal Massie (2010). Contingency, Time and Possibility, an Essay on Aristotle and Duns Scotus. Lexington Pbl..
Colin Connors (2009). Scotus and Ockham. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:141-153.
JT Paasch (2011). Are the Father and Son Different in Kind? Scotus and Ockham on Different Kinds of Things, Univocal and Equivocal Production, and Subordination in the Trinity. Vivarium 48 (3-4):302-326.
William Ockham (1983). Predestination, Foreknowledge, and Future Contingents. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Stephen D. Dumont (1992). The Propositio Famosa Scoti: Duns Scotus and Ockham on the Possibility of a Science of Theology. Dialogue 31 (03):415-.
Xunwu Chen (2011). Crisis and Possibility: The Ethical Implication of Contingency. Asian Philosophy 21 (3):257 - 268.
P. Garcia & F. Esteva (1995). On Ockham Algebras: Congruence Lattices and Subdirectly Irreducible Algebras. Studia Logica 55 (2):319 - 346.
Stephen Chak Tornay (1938). Ockham: Studies and Selections. La Salle, Ill.,The Open Court Publishing Company.
Sonja Schierbaum (2011). Knowing Lions and Understanding Lion: Two Jobs for Concepts in Ockham? Vivarium 48 (3-4):327-348.
William J. Courtenay (2008). Ockham and Ockhamism: Studies in the Dissemination and Impact of His Thought. Brill.
Yiwei Zheng (2001). Ockham's Connotation Theory and Ontological Elimination. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:623-634.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads9 ( #163,591 of 1,099,989 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #190,060 of 1,099,989 )
How can I increase my downloads?