David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (1):1-16 (2008)
I argue that contraception is morally wrong but that periodic abstinence (or natural family planning) is not. Further, I argue that altered nuclear transfer—a proposed technique for creating human stem cells without destroying human embryos—is morally wrong for the same reason that contraception is. Contrary to what readers might expect, my argument assumes nothing about the morality of cloning or abortion and requires no premises about God or natural teleology. Instead, I argue that contraception and altered nuclear transfer are morally wrong because they fail to treat humanity as an inviolable end
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Don Marquis (1989). Why Abortion is Immoral. Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
Joseph Boyle (1991). Who is Entitled to Double Effect? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Don Marquis (2004). Korcz's Objections to the Future-of-Value Argument. Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (1):56–60.
Keith Allen Korcz (2002). Two Moral Strategies Regarding Abortion. Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (4):581–605.
Citations of this work BETA
A. E. Hinkley (2008). Metaphysical Problems in the Philosophy of Medicine and Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (2):101-105.
Similar books and articles
Joshua Glasgow (2007). Kant's Conception of Humanity. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2):291-308.
Dmitry Shlapentokh (2001). Cosmism in European Thought. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:497-546.
Ken D. Olum (2002). The Doomsday Argument and the Number of Possible Observers. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):164-184.
Richard Dean (2006). The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory. Oxford University Press.
Tuija Takala (2007). Designer Babies and Treating People as a Means. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:245-249.
Richard Dean (2008). Glasgow's Conception of Kantian Humanity. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 307-314.
Japa Pallikkathayil (2010). Deriving Morality From Politics: Rethinking the Formula of Humanity. Ethics 121 (1):116-147.
Added to index2009-02-08
Total downloads60 ( #71,313 of 1,906,920 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #345,620 of 1,906,920 )
How can I increase my downloads?