David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (4):621-650 (2003)
The aim of this paper is to offer a conceptual analysis of Weinberg's proof of the spin-statistics theorem by comparing it with Pauli's original proof and with the subsequent textbook tradition, which typically resorts to the dichotomy positive energy for half-integral spin particles/microcausality for integral-spin particles. In contrast to this tradition, Weinberg's proof does not directly invoke the positivity of the energy, but derives the theorem from the single relativistic requirement of microcausality. This seemingly innocuous difference marks an important change in the conceptual basis of quantum physics. Its historical, theoretical, and conceptual roots are here reconstructed. The link between Weinberg's proof and Pauli's original is highlighted: Weinberg's proof turns out to do justice to Pauli's anti-Dirac lines of thought. The work of Furry and Oppenheimer is also surveyed as a “third way” between the textbook tradition established by Pauli and Weinberg's approach
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Breuer (2003). Another No‐Go Theorem for Hidden Variable Models of Inaccurate Spin 1 Measurements. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1368-1379.
Thomas Breuer (2003). Another No-Go Theorem for Hidden Variable Models of Inaccurate Spin 1 Measurements. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1368-1379.
Steven French (2000). Putting a New Spin on Particle Identity. In R. Hilborn & G. Tino (eds.), Spin Statistics Connection and Commutation Relations. 305-318.
Jonathan Bain (2013). CPT Invariance, the Spin-Statistics Connection, and the Ontology of Relativistic Quantum Field Theories. Erkenntnis 78 (4):797-821.
Katherine Bedard (1998). Bohm, Spin, and the Bell Inequalities. Synthese 114 (3):405-444.
Fred Richman (2000). Gleason's Theorem has a Constructive Proof. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (4):425-431.
Hiroakira Ono (1986). Craig's Interpolation Theorem for the Intuitionistic Logic and its Extensions—a Semantical Approach. Studia Logica 45 (1):19 - 33.
Paolo Gentilini (1999). Proof-Theoretic Modal PA-Completeness III: The Syntactic Proof. Studia Logica 63 (3):301-310.
Dick Jongh, Marc Jumelet & Franco Montagna (1991). On the Proof of Solovay's Theorem. Studia Logica 50 (1):51 - 69.
J. Todd Wilson (2001). An Intuitionistic Version of Zermelo's Proof That Every Choice Set Can Be Well-Ordered. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1121-1126.
Added to index2010-09-01
Total downloads7 ( #217,372 of 1,692,766 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #182,244 of 1,692,766 )
How can I increase my downloads?