David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 8 (1-2):67- (1958)
Cornford's interpretation of Anaxagoras' theory of matter was an attempt to solve the apparent contradiction between the Principle of Homoeomereity, as he calls it, and that which asserts that ‘there is a portion of everything in everything’; and also, perhaps, to assign a more definite place in the system to the qualitative ‘Opposites’ which Tannery and Burnet had asserted, in rather vague terms, to be Anaxagoras' elements. In effect he solves the problem by applying the former principle to the phenomenal world and to the Seeds which are the elements for Anaxagoras, and confining the latter, the principle of Universal Mixture as we may call it, to the Opposites, which are the substantial but inseparable constituents of the Seeds. By this tidy and ingenious solution he avoids not only the above-mentioned contradiction but also what he calls the grotesque and gratuitous absurdity of holding that a Seed of gold contains mostly gold, but also flesh and all other natural substances, in order to explain the possibility of various changes, the great majority of which never occur anyhow
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Daniel W. Graham (1994). The Postulates of Anaxagoras. Apeiron 27 (2):77 - 121.
Similar books and articles
John E. Sisko (2010). Anaxagoras Betwixt Parmenides and Plato. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):432-442.
F. M. Cornford (1930). Anaxagoras' Theory of Matter—I. Classical Quarterly 24 (01):14-30.
John E. Sisko (2010). Anaxagoras on Matter, Motion, and Multiple Worlds. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):443-454.
F. M. Cornford (1932). Aristotle, Physics 250A 9–19 and 266A 12–24. Classical Quarterly 26 (01):52-.
Dirk Baltzly (1999). Ammonius on Aristotle on Interpretation with Boethius on Aristotle on Interpretation, Blank and Kretzman (Trans). [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77:521-3.
Anaxagoras & Arthur Fairbanks (1898). Anaxagoras: Fragments and Commentary (The First Philosophers of Greece). K. Paul, Trench, Trubner.
Michael C. Stokes (1965). On Anaxagoras Part I: Anäxagoras' Theory of Matter. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 47 (1):1-19.
Joseph M. Magee (2000). Sense Organs and the Activity of Sensation in Aristotle. Phronesis 45 (4):306 - 330.
Joseph Magee (2000). Sense Organs and the Activity of Sensation in Aristotle. Phronesis 45 (4):306-330.
Francis Macdonald Cornford (1957). From Religion to Philosophy. New York, Harper.
Ralph J. Masiello (1969). A Note on Aristotle's Homoeomery and the Fragments of Anaxagoras. Modern Schoolman 46 (2):135-140.
D. J. Allan (1951). Essays By F. M. Cornford F. M. Cornford: The Unwritten Philosophy and Other Essays. Edited with an Introductory Memoir by W. K. C. Guthrie. Pp. Xix + 139. Cambridge: University Press, 1950. Cloth, 12s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 1 (3-4):160-161.
Randall R. Curren (1994). Justice, Instruction, and the Good: The Case for Public Education in Aristotle and Plato'sLaws. Studies in Philosophy and Education 13 (1):1-31.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads4 ( #424,619 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?