A Gower Maneuver: The American Society for Bioethics and Humanities' Resolution of the "Taking Stands" Debate
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):24-27 (2004)
The American Society for Bioethics and Humanities debated for several years about whether it should adopt positions and, if so, on what range of issues. The membership recently approved an amendment to its bylaws permitting the Society to adopt positions on matters related to academic freedom and professionalism but not on substantive moral and policy issues. This resolution is problematic for a number of reasons, including the lack of a categorical difference between these types of claims and the Society's inability to speak on behalf of patients and research subjects. The implementation of the amendment also raises several issues. The Society will need to refrain from speaking too specifically and to articulate the responsibilities of its members. If the Society fails to address these concerns, it runs the risk of denigrating its public image and that of the profession
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Armand H. Matheny Antommaria (2004). A Gower Maneuver: The American Society for Bioethics and Humanities' Resolution of the "Taking Stands" Debate. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):24 – 27.
J. S. Youngner (2003). Promoting Research Integrity at the American Society for Microbiology. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):215-220.
W. Nelson (2006). Rural and Non-Rural Differences in Membership of the American Society of Bioethics and Humanities. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (7):411-413.
Mark P. Aulisio & L. S. Rothenberg (2002). Bioethics, Medical Humanities, and the Future of the "Field": Reflections on the Results of the ASBH Survey of North American Graduate Bioethics/Medical Humanities Training Programs. American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):3 – 9.
Barbara Adam, Ulrich Beck & Joost van Loon (eds.) (2000). The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. Sage.
H. Tristram Engelhardt (2011). Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultants: In Search of Professional Status in a Post-Modern World. HEC Forum 23 (3):129-145.
Thomas May (1999). Bioethics in a Liberal Society. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):1-19.
Thomas May (2002). Bioethics in a Liberal Society: The Political Framework of Bioethics Decision Making. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jozef Glasa (2000). Bioethics and the Challenges of a Society in Transition: The Birth and Development of Bioethics in Post-Totalitarian Slovakia. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (2):165-170.
James Stacey Taylor (2005). A Review Of: “Thomas May. 2002.Bioethics in a Liberal Society: The Political Framework of Bioethics Decision Making”. [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):92-93.
Jacquelyn Ann K. Kegley (2012). Mining the Past, Acting in the Present, and Enriching the Future. The Pluralist 7 (3):7-24.
H. T. Engelhardt (2011). Confronting Moral Pluralism in Posttraditional Western Societies: Bioethics Critically Reassessed. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):243-260.
Armand H. Matheny Antommaria (2012). Empowering, Teaching, and Occasionally Advocating: Clinical Ethics Consultants' Duties to All of the Participants in the Process. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):11 - 13.
Bette Ann Stead & Janice J. Miller (1988). Can Social Awareness Be Increased Through Business School Curricula? Journal of Business Ethics 7 (7):553 - 560.
Laurie Zoloth (2002). Stem Cell Research: A Target Article Collection Part I - Jordan's Banks, a View From the First Years of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. American Journal of Bioethics 2 (1):3 – 11.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-14
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?