Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||What do we directly hear? In section I, I define direct perception, and outline the logical atomist way of attacking the question. I argue in section II that atomism fails. Then, in sections III-V, I propose that a better alternative to atomism is to revive and modernize another traditional empiricist doctrine: that we directly sense what the senses deliver to automatic (i.e., sub-personal) processes of learning|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Casey O'Callaghan (2010). Perceiving the Locations of Sounds. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (1):123-140.
Susan Pockett (1999). Anesthesia and the Electrophysiology of Auditory Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (1):45-61.
Manuel Liz (2006). Camouflaged Physical Objects. Theoria 21 (2):165-184.
Hannes Ole Matthiessen (2010). Seeing and Hearing Directly. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (1):91-103.
David H. Sanford (1976). The Primary Objects of Perception. Mind 85 (April):189-208.
Josef P. Rauschecker (2005). Vocal Gestures and Auditory Objects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):143-144.
Matthew Nudds (2010). What Are Auditory Objects? Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (1):105-122.
Casey O'Callaghan (2008). Object Perception: Vision and Audition. Philosophy Compass 3 (4):803-829.
Mohan Matthen (2010). On the Diversity of Auditory Objects. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (1):63-89.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-07-09
Total downloads8 ( #131,747 of 727,488 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?