David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Biology and Philosophy 10 (3):309-337 (1995)
We are concerned with two modes of describing the dynamics of natural systems. Global descriptions require simultaneous global coordination of all dynamical operations. Global dynamics, including mechanics, remain invariant in the absence of external perturbation. But, failing impossible global coordination, dynamical operations could actually become coordinated only locally. In local records, as in global ones, the law of the excluded middle would be strictly observed, but without global coordination it could only be fullfilled sequentially by passing causative factors forward onto subsequent contiguous operations.The local dynamics of sequential operations would be indefinite with regard to how commitments will be made which will avoid violating the law of the excluded middle, but any resulting record will be as definite as if there had been global coordination. While maintaining an agential capacity for making contingent choices internally, local dynamics could be cumulated into a global record of seemingly simultaneous operations. Natural selection within a framework of local dynamics would have a capacity for making opportunistic commitments, but its effects in a posterior record can be reduced to the mechanistic neodarwinian version as if there had been a global dynamics. However, the resulting global description falsifies the actual material nature of the dynamics.
|Keywords||dynamics duration evocative logic Laplacean demon materialism mechanicism neo-Darwinism observation vagueness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ervin Laszlo (2007). Evolution of the Global Corporation: A Systemic Perspective. World Futures 63 (8):563 – 567.
Frank Dochy (1995). Human Population Growth: Local Dynamics-Global Effects. Acta Biotheoretica 43 (3).
Stephen Maitzen (2006). The Impossibility of Local Skepticism. Philosophia 34 (4):453-464.
Paul L. Nunez (2000). Toward a Quantitative Description of Large-Scale Neocortical Dynamic Function and EEG. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):371-398.
Mario Castagnino & Olimpia Lombardi (2009). The Global Non-Entropic Arrow of Time: From Global Geometrical Asymmetry to Local Energy Flow. Synthese 169 (1):1 - 25.
Bradford Skow (2008). Local and Global Relativity Principles. Philosophers' Imprint 8 (10):1-14.
V. Kolev & J. Yordanova (2000). The Position of Event-Related EEG Activity in the Local/Global Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):407-407.
Walter J. Freeman & Robert Kozma (2000). Local-Global Interactions and the Role of Mesoscopic (Intermediate-Range) Elements in Brain Dynamics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):401-401.
David T. J. Liley (2000). Local and Global Dynamical Control Parameters Are Not so Easily Separated. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):407-408.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #220,749 of 1,010,217 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,700 of 1,010,217 )
How can I increase my downloads?