David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 13 (4):531-553 (2005)
: The main contribution of this paper to current philosophical and sociological studies on modeling is to analyze modeling as an object-oriented interdisciplinary activity and thus to bring new insights into the wide, heterogeneous discourse on tools, forms and organization of interdisciplinary research. A detailed analysis of interdisciplinarity in the making of models is presented, focusing on long-standing interdisciplinary collaboration between specialists in infectious diseases, mathematicians and computer scientists. The analysis introduces a novel way of studying the elements of the models as carriers of interdisciplinarity. These elements, being functionally interdependent building blocks, evolve during the modeling work and carry the disciplinary tensions in the process. This shows how the long and challenging process of defining and reformulating the object of research is crucial for understanding the dynamics of interdisciplinarity in the making
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Erika Mansnerus (2013). Modeling in the Social Sciences: Interdisciplinary Comparison. Perspectives on Science 21 (2):267-272.
Randy Harris (2009). Alan Gross and the Rhetoric of Science. Perspectives on Science 17 (3):pp. 346-380.
Till Grüne-Yanoff & Uskali Mäki (2014). Introduction: Interdisciplinary Model Exchanges. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 48:52-59.
Jane Calvert (2012). Systems Biology, Synthetic Biology and Data-Driven Research: A Commentary on Krohs, Callebaut, and O'Malley and Soyer. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (1):81-84.
Jane Calvert (2012). Systems Biology, Synthetic Biology and Data-Driven Research: A Commentary on Krohs, Callebaut, and O’Malley and Soyer. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):81-84.
Similar books and articles
Sabina Gainotti, Nicola Moran, Carlo Petrini & Darren Shickle (2008). Ethical Models Underpinning Responses to Threats to Public Health: A Comparison of Approaches to Communicable Disease Control in Europe. Bioethics 22 (9):466-476.
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (2006). Interdisciplinarity and Peirce's Classification of the Sciences: A Centennial Reassessment. Perspectives on Science 14 (2):127-152.
Bart van Klink & Sanne Taekema, A Dynamic Model of Interdisciplinarity: Limits and Possibilities of Interdisciplinary Research Into Law.
Jan C. Schmidt (2011). What is a Problem? Poiesis and Praxis 7 (4):249-274.
Robert Frodeman (ed.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press.
Robert Frodeman, Julie Thompson Klein & Carl Mitcham (eds.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. OUP Oxford.
Joachim Schummer (2004). Interdisciplinary Issues in Nanoscale Research. In Baird D. (ed.), Discovering the Nanoscale. Ios 9--20.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #185,953 of 1,911,593 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #253,681 of 1,911,593 )
How can I increase my downloads?