David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Radical Philosophy Review 9 (1):65-77 (2006)
What does race add to class, as both are secular social categories? The difficulties of invidious nationalism and the conservation of races that would not foment holy wars of terror persist for both secular or postsecular theorists. Postsecular thinkers are in a stronger position than a secular theorist to challenge religiously inflected social integrations, invidious nationalism, and fundamentalism.Unmasking them as social formation proffers an external criticism, to speak of them as sacralizations of identity exposes them at the root. Secular theorists ignore postsecular sensibility at the peril of failing to challenge the invidious claim to roots that secular nationalism and religious fundamentalism profess
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Liah Greenfeld (1996). The Modern Religion? Critical Review 10 (2):169-191.
Stefan Rummens (2010). The Semantic Potential of Religious Arguments. Social Theory and Practice 36 (3):385-408.
Brian T. Trainor (2011). Augustine's 'Sacred Reign‐Secular Rule' Conception of the State; a Bridge From the West's' Foundational Roots to its Post‐Secular Destiny, and Between 'the West' and 'the Rest'. Heythrop Journal 54 (5):373-387.
Warren Breckman & Lars Trägårdh (1996). Nationalism, Individualism, and Capitalism: Reply to Greenfeld. Critical Review 10 (3):389-407.
Idil Boran (2001). Contra Moore: The Dependency of Identity on Culture. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 4 (2):26-44.
Maeve Cooke (2007). A Secular State for a Postsecular Society? Postmetaphysical Political Theory and the Place of Religion. Constellations 14 (2):224-238.
Torbjörn Tännsjö (1995). The Secular Model of the Multi‐Cultural State. Inquiry 38 (1-2):109-117.
Patrick Maynard (1983). The Secular Icon: Photography and the Functions of Images. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42 (2):155-169.
Cornelius Kampe (2000). In Defense of Nationalism with Reference to Canada and the Baltics. Social Philosophy Today 16:47-56.
Brayton Polka (2005). Who is the Single Individual?: On the Religious and the Secular in Kierkegaard. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):157-175.
Christopher J. Eberle (1999). Why Restraint is Religiously Unacceptable. Religious Studies 35 (3):247-276.
Rosi Braidotti (2011). Nomadic Theory: The Portable Rosi Braidotti. Columbia University Press.
Lauren F. Pfister (2012). Post-Secularity Within Contemporary Chinese Philosophical Contexts. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39 (1):121-138.
Joshua Delpech-Ramey (2007). The Idol as Icon. Angelaki 12 (1):87 – 96.
Neil McLaughlin (1996). Nazism, Nationalism, and the Sociology of Emotions: Escape From Freedom Revisited. Sociological Theory 14 (3):241-261.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?