Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):509–526 (2006)
|Abstract||In this paper, I argue that John Locke's account of knowledge coupled with his commitments to moral ideas being voluntary constructions of our own minds and to divine voluntarism (moral rules are given by God according to his will) leads to a seriously flawed view of moral knowledge. After explicating Locke's view of moral knowledge, highlighting the specific problems that seem to arise from it, and suggesting some possible Lockean responses, I conclude that the best Locke can do is give us a trivial account of moral knowledge which cannot avoid problems with subjectivity and relativism.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patricia Sheridan (2007). Reflection, Nature, and Moral Law: The Extent of Catharine Cockburn's Lockeanism in Her. Hypatia 22 (3).
Sarah McGrath (2004). Moral Knowledge by Perception. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):209–228.
Greg Forster (2005). John Locke's Politics of Moral Consensus. Cambridge University Press.
Nicholas Jolley (1999). Locke: His Philosophical Thought. Oxford University Press.
John W. Yolton (2004). The Two Intellectual Worlds of John Locke: Man, Person, and Spirits in the Essay. Cornell University Press.
Aaron Zimmerman (2010). Moral Epistemology. Routledge.
I. C. Tipton (ed.) (1977). Locke on Human Understanding: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
Jennifer Nagel (forthcoming). Sensitive Knowledge: Locke on Sensation and Skepticism. In Matthew Stuart (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Locke. Blackwell.
Lex Newman (2007). Locke on Knowledge. In Lex Newman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Locke's "Essay Concerning Human Understanding". Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #30,732 of 722,871 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,871 )
How can I increase my downloads?