David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Zygon 45 (3):558-574 (2010)
People discussing science and religion usually frame their conversations in terms of essentialist assumptions about science, assumptions requiring the existence (but not the specification) of criteria according to which science can be distinguished from other forms of inquiry. However, criteria functioning at a level of generality appropriate to such discussions may not exist at all. Essentialist assumptions may be avoided if science is understood within a broader context of human practices. In a philosophy of practices, to label a practice as “scientific” is to make a practically motivated provision for a way of speaking. Charles Taylor and Joseph Rouse have produced complementary philosophies of practice that promote this kind of understanding. In this essay I review the work of Taylor and Rouse, identify apparent residues of essentialism that each seems to harbor, and offer a resolution to some of their disagreements. I also criticize a form of essentialism commonly employed in Christian circles and outline an anti-essentialist view of science that may be helpful in science-and-religion discussions.
|Keywords||aims of science Joseph Rouse hermeneutics philosophy of practice Charles Taylor objectivity philosophy of science essentialism Christian philosophy scientific practices critical realism science and religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Charles Taylor (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard University Press.
Thomas S. Kuhn (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Vol. The University of Chicago Press.
Ruth Abbey (2015). Charles Taylor. Routledge.
Charles Taylor (1995). Philosophical Arguments. Harvard University Press.
Joseph Rouse (2002). How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Philip Hefner (2010). Embodied Science: Recentering Religion-and-Science. Zygon 45 (1):251-263.
Joseph Rouse (1996). Engaging Science: How to Understand its Practices Philosophically. Cornell University Press.
Jeff Kochan (2011). Getting Real with Rouse and Heidegger. Perspectives on Science 19 (1):81-115.
Dimitri Ginev (2005). Against the Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):191 – 208.
Francis Remedios (1998). Review of ' Engaging Science: How to Understand its Practices Philosophically, by Joseph Rouse. [REVIEW] Social Epistemology 12 (2):147 – 150.
Joseph Rouse (1994). Engaging Science Through Cultural Studies. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:396 - 401.
Francis Remedios (2003). Fuller and Rouse on the Legitimation of Scientific Knowledge. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):444-463.
Ann Milliken Pederson (2010). The Nature of Embodiment: Religion and Science in Dialogue. Zygon 45 (1):264-272.
Stephen P. Turner (2007). Explaining Normativity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (1):57-73.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads63 ( #54,147 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?