David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
About the book: One of the issues underlying current debates between practitioners of art history, visual culture and aesthetics is whether the visual is a unique, irreducible category, or whether it can be assimilated with the textual or verbal without any significant loss. Can paintings, buildings or installations be 'read' in the way texts are read or deciphered, or do works of visual art ask for their own kind of appreciation? This is not only a question of choosing the right method in dealing with visual works of art, but also an issue that touches on the roots of the disciplines involved: can a case be made for the visual as an irreducible category of art, and if so, how is it best studied and appreciated? In this anthology, this question is approached from the angles of three disciplines: aesthetics, visual culture and art history. Unlike many existing overviews of visual culture studies, it includes both painting and architecture, and investigates historical ways of defining and appreciating the visual in their own, contemporary terms. Dealing with the Visual will be of great use to advanced students because it offers an overview of current debates, and to graduate students and professionals in the field because the essays offer in-depth investigations of the methodological issues involved and various historical ways of defining visuality. The topics included range from early modern ways of viewing pictures and sixteenth-century views of Palladio's villas in their landscape settings to contemporary debate about whether there is life yet in painting
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Duncum & Ted Bracey (eds.) (2001). On Knowing: Art and Visual Culture. Canterbury University Press.
Peter Brunette & David Wills (eds.) (1994). Deconstruction and the Visual Arts: Art, Media, Architecture. Cambridge University Press.
Tiffany Sutton (2000). The Classification of Visual Art: A Philosophical Myth and its History. Cambridge University Press.
J. Gaiger (2006). Dealing with the Visual: Art History, Aesthetics and Visual Culture. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):102-104.
Jean-Luc Marion (2004). The Crossing of the Visible. Stanford University Press.
Jessica Evans & Stuart Hall (eds.) (1999). Visual Culture: The Reader. Sage Publications in Association with the Open University.
Philip Alperson (ed.) (1992). The Philosophy of the Visual Arts. Oxford University Press.
Ian Heywood & Barry Sandywell (eds.) (1999). Interpreting Visual Culture: Explorations in the Hermeneutics of the Visual. Routledge.
Peter De Bolla (2003). The Education of the Eye: Painting, Landscape, and Architecture in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Stanford University Press.
Added to index2010-07-25
Total downloads12 ( #286,939 of 1,796,251 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,795 of 1,796,251 )
How can I increase my downloads?