David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 6 (02):233- (1994)
According to what one might call ‘indirect” forms of utilitarian thinking, the proper end of all human action is the greatest happiness of the greatest number of individuals, but due to the fallibility of moral agents this end cannot, and must not, be directly pursued. Instead, according to at least one version of the indirect theory, moral agents have a duty to act in conformity with a set of general rules which, in their turn, have been designed to promote the greatest happiness of humankind. But acts which conform to such general rules can under exceptional circumstances occasion more suffering than happiness. This is clearly problematical to indirect utilitarians. If they follow the rules regardless of the evil consequences, it can be argued that they have abandoned the basic principles of utilitarianism. If, on the other hand, they refuse to follow the rules which normally promote the general good, their view can be seen to collapse into the direct form of the creed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David Berman (1986). The Jacobitism of Berkeley's Passive Obedience. Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (2):309-319.
Heta Häyry & Matti Häyry (1989). Utilitarianism, Human Rights and the Redistribution of Health Through Preventive Medical Measures. Journal of Applied Philosophy 6 (1):43-52.
Matti Hayry & Heta Hayry (1990). Health Care as a Right, Fairness and Medical Resources. Bioethics 4 (1):1–21.
Matti Häyry & Heta Häyry (1989). AIDS, Society, and Morality —a Philosophical Survey. Philosophia 19 (4):331-361.
Heta Häyry & Matti Häyry (1990). Euthanasia, Ethics and Economics. Bioethics 4 (2):154–161.
Matti Häyry & Heta Häyry (1995). Artistic Value as an Excuse for Spreading Cinematographic Filth. Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (4):469-483.
Heta Häyry & Matti Hayry (1987). Aids Now. Bioethics 1 (4):339–356.
By Michael Ridge (2006). Introducing Variable-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):242–253.
Michael Ridge (2006). Introducing Variable-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):242 - 253.
Conrad D. Johnson (1991). Moral Legislation: A Legal-Political Model for Indirect Consequentialist Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
J. Moreh (1992). Economic Analysis, Common-Sense Morality and Utilitarianism. Erkenntnis 37 (1):115 - 143.
Baruch A. Brody (1970). Moral Rules and Particular Circumstances. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
Holly Smith (2010). Measuring the Consequences of Rules. Utilitas 22 (4):413-433.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads10 ( #227,904 of 1,725,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,420 of 1,725,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?