David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Husserl Studies 25 (2):97-120 (2009)
In recent philosophy of mind, a series of challenging ideas have appeared about the relation between the body and the sense of touch. In certain respects, these ideas have a striking affinity with Husserl’s theory of the constitution of the body. Nevertheless, these two approaches lead to very different understandings of the role of the body in perception. Either the body is characterized as a perceptual “organ,” or the body is said to function as a “template.” Despite its focus on the sense of touch, the latter conception, I will argue, nevertheless orients its understanding of tactual perception toward visual objects. This produces a distorted conception of touch. In this paper, I will formulate an alternative account, which is more faithful to what it is like to feel.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Brian O'Shaughnessy (2000). Consciousness and the World. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Reid (1764). An Inquiry Into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense. A. Millar, and A. Kincaid & J. Bell.
M. Scott (2001). Tactual Perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2):149-160.
Citations of this work BETA
Catherine Green (2013). Philosophic Reflections on the Meaning of Touch in Nurse–Patient Interactions. Nursing Philosophy 14 (4):242-253.
Similar books and articles
Glenn Carruthers (2009). Is the Body Schema Sufficient for the Sense of Embodiment? An Alternative to de Vignmont's Model. Philosophical Psychology 22 (2):123-142.
Nicholas P. Holmes & Charles Spence (2006). Beyond the Body Schema: Visual, Prosthetic, and Technological Contributions to Bodily Perception and Awareness. In Günther Knoblich, Ian M. Thornton, Marc Grosjean & Maggie Shiffrar (eds.), Human Body Perception From the Inside Out. Oxford University Press. 15-64.
Helena De Preester & Manos Tsakiris (2009). Body-Extension Versus Body-Incorporation: Is There a Need for a Body-Model? [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (3):307-319.
Rebecca Steiner Goldner (2011). Touch and Flesh in Aristotle's de Anima. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):435-446.
Gary Hatfield (2005). Rationalist Theories of Sense Perception and Mind-Body Relation. In A Companion to Rationalism (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy). Blackwell.
David Morris (2002). Touching Intelligence. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 29 (149-162):149-162.
Matthew Ratcliffe (2008). Touch and Situatedness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (3):299 – 322.
Abraham P. Bos (2010). The Soul's Instrument for Touching in Aristotle, on the Soul II 11, 422b34–423a21. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (1):89-102.
Alia Al-Saji (2010). Bodies and Sensings: On the Uses of Husserlian Phenomenology for Feminist Theory. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):13-37.
Added to index2009-02-07
Total downloads179 ( #5,203 of 1,692,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #38,242 of 1,692,540 )
How can I increase my downloads?