David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Papers 39 (2):183-208 (2010)
Among theories of personal identity over time the simple view has not been popular among philosophers, but it nevertheless remains the default view among non philosophers. It may be construed either as the view that nothing grounds a claim of personal identity over time, or that something quite simple (a soul perhaps) is the ground. If the former construal is accepted, a conspicuous difficulty is that the condition of causal dependence between person-stages is absent. But this leaves such a view open to an objection from the failure to provide a condition of individuation. If, on the other hand something like a soul is said to ground personal identity over time, such an account turns out to be more suited to a kind of continuity view.
|Keywords||Personal Identity Simple View Causal condition|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Troy Catterson (2008). Introduction. Synthese 162 (3):309-311.
Robert Elliot (1991). Personal Identity and the Causal Continuity Requirement. Philosophical Quarterly 41 (January):55-75.
Daniel Kolak & R. Martin (1987). Personal Identity and Causality: Becoming Unglued. American Philosophical Quarterly 24 (October):339-347.
Bruce Langtry (1975). Similarity, Continuity and Survival. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):3 – 18.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ignacio Moya Arriagada (2009). The Primacy of Space in Heidegger and Taylor: Towards a Unified Account of Personal Identity. Appraisal 7 (4):17-24.
Steve Matthews (1998). Personal Identity, Multiple Personality Disorder, and Moral Personhood. Philosophical Psychology 11 (1):67-88.
Johan E. Gustafsson (2010). Did Locke Defend the Memory Continuity Criterion of Personal Identity? Locke Studies 10:113–129.
Andrei A. Buckareff & Joel S. Van Wagenen (2010). Surviving Resurrection. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (3):123-139.
Lynne Rudder Baker (1999). What Am I? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):151-159.
Matti Eklund (2004). Personal Identity, Concerns, and Indeterminacy. The Monist 87 (4):489-511.
Patrick Toner (2011). On Hylemorphism and Personal Identity. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):454-473.
Eric T. Olson (2006). Is There a Bodily Criterion of Personal Identity? In Fraser MacBride (ed.), Identity and Modality. Oxford University Press. 242.
Marya Schechtman (2010). Memory and Identity. Philosophical Studies 153 (1):65-79.
Eric T. Olson (2002). What Does Functionalism Tell Us About Personal Identity? Noûs 36 (4):682-698.
Added to index2010-06-27
Total downloads86 ( #19,409 of 1,692,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #38,408 of 1,692,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?