Oxford University Press (1999)
|Abstract||Gareth Matthews suggests that we can better understand the nature of philosophical inquiry if we recognize the central role played by perplexity. The seminal representation of philosophical perplexity is in Plato's dialogues; Matthews examines the intriguing shifts in Plato's attitude to perplexity and suggests that these may represent a course of philosophical development that philosophers follow even today.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$48.94 used (51% off) $79.70 new (20% off) $85.40 direct from Amazon (14% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B105.P47.M37 1999|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roslyn Weiss (2001). Socratic Perplexity and the Nature of Philosophy, And: The Philosophy of Socrates (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (1):137-139.
Michael Golluber (2001). Aristotle on Knowledge and the Sense of Touch. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:655-680.
C. C. W. Taylor (2000). Socratic Perplexity and the Nature of Philosophy. Ancient Philosophy 20 (2):451-454.
Malcolm Clark (1972). Perplexity and Knowledge. The Hague,Nijhoff.
Peter Boghossian (2011). Socratic Pedagogy: Perplexity, Humiliation, Shame and a Broken Egg. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (7):710-720.
M. V. Dougherty (2001). Perplexity Simpliciter and Perplexity Secundum Quid. International Philosophical Quarterly 41 (4):469-480.
Gareth B. Matthews (1997). Perplexity in Plato, Aristotole, and Tarski. Philosophical Studies 85 (2-3):213-228.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,306 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?